Adding new Civs or reworking old ones?

[SamePorpoise303]

They’re not Anglo-Saxons, current Britons are British/English by intention but actually Welsh as a result and with a British/Norman campaign.
Anglo-Saxons are currently represented by Goths.

[Cronin]

For me , i prefered to rework the Civs. 'Cuz , i just want to ensure that the old Aoe II civs remained up to date should the the new dlc will arrived in the future. That it’s all i asked. Oh, and adding new campaign will also be a good thing too.

[BitStuffer]

@Temudhun

I’m in favor of both things, and possibly splitting civs including old ones. I don’t think the two options should be pitted against each other.

I’m too, I was clickbaiting as I stated, I think most of the effort should go to reworking/splitting while adding new civs should be rarer.

@SamePorpoise303

They’re not Anglo-Saxons, current Britons are British/English by intention but actually Welsh as a result and with a British/Norman campaign.
Anglo-Saxons are currently represented by Goths.

Just the fact that you can interpret this way proves that those Civs aren’t correctly representing what they should.

[Alexios732]

@DynasticPlanet5

To you, it sounds like Toltecs and Chimu and the many “wealthier than Europe” Sahara empires were savages that didn’t have advanced agriculture and cities and trade. Let alone a written language which in the case of almost every civ is completely untrue.

I still don’t get the African civs hype, what’re they doing over there anyways? Almost all historical & era defining moments in medieval era happened in Europe, Middle East, & Asia. I honestly don’t get what so exciting about Africa at this particular timeline (maybe Kingdom of Makuria’s clash with the Mamluks, but that’s all I know)

For me, reworking the old civs is a must, it’s about time they should adapt to the newer & more advanced civs. Not to mention reworking building architectures.

[MUTYLATOR5553]

@Hzdrafxx

There is call for German Split, Italians Split, Slavic Split, Iberian Split. I see them much more often.

There are entire threads about them each.

You missed a Vikings Split

[DynasticPlanet5]

@Alexios732

I still don’t get the African civs hype, what’re they doing over there anyways

Well besides the fact that most of the Sahara was the greatest source of gold and salt with economies so great they could dwarf 5 European civs combined?? Wait what else do you need besides that and grand cities and large fielded armies and trade routes? It certainly wasnt visits from African pilgrimage to Mecca that spent so much they’d tank Middle Eastern economies into a recession.

But I shouldnt rob you of the chance to learn should I? Thatd be mean assuming you are actually coming from a genuine place of curiosity (a lot of people have not)