user91
March 30, 2025, 4:23am
1
Just look, all 4 kings sharing same model and crowns, shouldnt it be a bit different at least?
Like in FFA Nomad? why not use the monarch model to mix it up at least?
and i call it lannister cuz game of thrones is based on war of the roses
Why are all 4 Kings Henry?
Atleast they are called lord so we can think them like the same unit like man at arms.If they have different names they need their own model.
Well they are all the same unit.
Originally I thought they’d be four distinct units each with a different ability or aura (like campaign heroes).
However, they are really just like bannermen. It makes sense though if they’re trying to keep this faction relatively simple to play.
But is not
This is not Song of Ice and Fire (the OG work where GoT is based on)
This is Age of Empires
Its design is based on the heraldry used by some nobles during the English military campaigns of the Hundred Years’ War. There are some images in Pinterest; this is one.
This is another one of Osprey, English knights 1400-1500.
1 Like
Also having a two handed sword with a shield is weird
user91
March 31, 2025, 6:46am
8
They should remove the crowns, if they are a unit, its too strange having 4 of them roaming around
this isnt dynasty warriors
This is actually good point
two handed sword with a shield is nonsense
If it was a buckler it’d work I think.
Well the crown might be a good thing so the opponent can detect the unit in a blob to focus it.
I like the skin overall I just wish they had a one handed sword, the two handed makes it look weird.
1 Like
They’re still a special limited pop unit.
The crown makes counterplay easier. Maybe bannermen should have something similiar.
user91
April 1, 2025, 7:44am
13
yes but bannerman doesnt glow nor do they have a crown at all time
looks stupid
They do glow. They don’t have a floating symbol above them though. Just a flag on their back.