I don’t want to play different maps in different modes, I want to play all maps in all modes. I’m already sick of the monotony. I can play these maps without scouting. I know where the FB is going to be. Seriously, how many times during a rush have we started building barracks 10 meters away from each other with the enemy team.
You mean like King of the Hill, Deathmatch, Empire Wars, and Tycoon Mode?
I got the sense he meant he wanted all the maps in ranked…
I’d just like king of the hill to be a mode not a map.
Note: dummy alert, I meant Regicide - KotH is a mode.
Wait a minute. Isn’t it anymore?
I wish Regicide were a standard mode instead of just a variant of Honshu.
Sorry, I’m a dummy - I meant Regicide. (I blame it on the royalty terminology, haha)
LOL! I just said I want all maps to be usable in all modes. And received a sarcastic response. What’s the problem? What, teams can’t play ranked games in Borneo or Indochina?
What cards? You mentioned maps not cards. No ones mentioned cards till now. I wouldnt be sarcastic as much if things were clear and consistent. Are we talking about maps? Maps in ranked? Map selection? If youre going to complain to me given your history of insulting others and me constantly you could at least be clear in your goals of what you are trying to discuss. Are we discussing ranked maps? The lack of a true “all maps in 1 pool” option in lobby? Card options now?
Many maps aren’t viable as “competitive maps” bc they strongly favor a few civs to the point where in an otherwise playable MU you might as well resign. At lower levels it might still be fine, but when you hit a level where people know the maps/civs well, it gets very unfair. Maps like Deccan and Horn shouldn’t be in the current pool for that reason. Civs like Otto receive a massively outsized advantage on maps like Deccan. This isn’t to say the competitive maps shouldn’t be shuffled occasionally. They should, but haven’t been in a long time (but the request was basically “please add all maps to the pool”, which is a terrible idea).
In team, you have a bit more freedom to have more maps. But some maps still don’t belong.
Que a sarcastic response that either fails to understand what I’m saying or disagrees out of a lack of intermediate-high level experience in 3, 2, 1:
I couldn’t have made it clearer that I’m talking about rating maps.
Show me my offensive statements, I would like to see them myself.
I’m very glad that you officially stated that you consider half of the maps in this game to be garbage.
What did I pay money for? Seriously. What other game doesn’t randomly rate all maps? I really want to know.
I would also like to know who gets the advantages on the Orinoco, Minas Gereras, Andes, Mexico, Yamal, Punjab, Parallel Rivers, Panama, Pampas Sierras, Siwa Oasis, Savanna, Sahel, Saharan Routes, Pepper Coast, Nile Valley, Niger River, Niger Delta, Lake Victoria, Lake Chad, Ivory Coast, Horn, Highlands, Great Rift, Gold Coast, Dunes - The Eye, Congo Basin, Atlas?
I’ve only seen them 1 vs 1.
You know we can see edit history right? And offensive is this, acting like you made it clear when you yourself edited afterwards. To act like I’m crazy or misunderstanding when clearly even you recognized it made no sense what you said. The respectful thing to do would be to admit it was a typo or unclear instead of acting like the other person is wrong. What you just did is considered gaslighting btw
As for offensive, laughing (hahahaa) at others gameplay and calling players like ungurs noobs is just off the top of my head but i dont think you want to really have that convo.
So to be clear, you want ranked maps to have more, less balanced maps for variety?
I made another “GASLIGHTING EDIT”
Tell me what you didn’t understand from what is written here. Maybe I will improve my knowledge of the language.
To be clear, you made the card comment then i responded asking what was going on since you introduced cards. Then you edited it, and instead of acknowledging it acted condescending to me for being confused when you added in cards before. When you make a mistake and not admit it but be condescending this is considered offensive. In any language. The polite thing to do is to admit your mistakes apologize for any confusion then clarify. This is just good etiquette in discourse.
If you’re able to have good etiquette I’ll explain the reasons for many of those maps exclusions or removals to ranked pool
My mistake. I should have studied the statistics on Free Food Party. Some maps aren’t displayed there, so it’s not super correct, but I’ll show you everything that’s displayed.
Over the last 30 days.
- Dakota - 9
- Spain - 9
- New England - 9
- Central Plain - 8
- Kamchatka - 8
- Deccan - 8
- Saxony - 7
- Great Plains - 7
- Himalayas - 7
- Lithuania - 7
- Yukon - 7
- Manchuria - 6
- Florida - 6
- Scandinavia - 6
- Fertile Crescent - 6
- California - 5
- Gran Chaco - 5
- Pepper Coast - 5
- Ozarks - 5
- Carolina - 5
- Muscovy - 5
- Panama - 5
- Pyrenees - 4
- Karelian Lakes - 4
- Sudd - 4
- Mongolia - 4
- Texas - 4
- Saguenay - 3
- Hungarian Plains - 3
- Sahel - 3
- Patagonia - 3
- Darfur - 3
- Pampas Sierras - 3
- Arabia - 3
- Guianas - 2
- Wallachia - 2
- Pomerania - 1
Total 37/136 maps available for play. Some of them are super common, some are average, some are 1-2 times!
I’ve clarified the situation. I don’t have to apologize for making a mistake if I corrected it. Apparently there’s no problem guessing what the original post was about. You’re just playing dumb to start a fight over a misprint that offended you.
99 maps are unbalanced you mean?
you still have not answered my question, what is the boring map- the ranked queue? or as Moozilla was speaking to, map modes in general? You appear to be speaking to the ranked pool which in 1v1 there are specific reasons.
cept you didn’t until after i made the post and then was insulting- you first made the mistake. then insulted when i was not being sarcastic or mean spirited. i am not a mind reader and your english is confusing and often does not translate. many people have told you this. you cannot assume someone asking for clarification.
and you are purposefully being rude because you got caught being facetious. the only one offended is you. I cant understand a lot of your very badly translated words and was only asking for clarification when you were rude. The only one who has continued to act purposefully in bad faith has been you day after day.
Im still not sure 100% why even after the mistake, once more you are putting the word “card” again in to be either troll on purpose or once again confusing. In a game with cards as part of the core system, using the word card instead of map cant be 100% accurate or clear to others. Like this:
I dont think a person who speaks are rudely and unintelligibly as you consistently deserves any more of my time, if others want to they can but dont ping me since you’ve been nothing but rude in this and about every post while showing contempt for anyone trying to figure out exactly what is your question. please refrain from tagging me.
I’m saying that 1v1 is played with all 100 cards, and 3v3 is played with only 37. I don’t understand why there are such restrictions.
Point your finger at the insult.
So I guess I should apologize for this?
You are the only person on this forum who doesn’t understand something in my posts.
SI vous pouvez vous arrêter dans vos attaques personnels ce serais bien pour vous deux, je ne sais pas, mais dans ce cas là ignorez vous.
No. Maps don’t have to be competitive. Some are fun for FFA, or are just unique and totally usable vs the AI. Others are suitable for lobbies because everyone can choose civs and/or decks based on the map.

Total 37/136 maps available for play.
Firstly, 99 maps are eliminated from competition in team games.
Secondly, all these maps are played in 1vs1 ranked battles. Why?