Civilization Craft: Kazakhs

[quote=“UpmostRook9474, post:68, topic:205663”]
the Magyars, Bulgarians, Mongols and even Koreans are also same peoples with Turks
Not all Magyars not all Bulgarians not even at all…Some Magyars in Hungary (who have roots of Attila’s Huns)
Not all Bulgarians today but some of these who were descendants of Avar’s.
Try to understand things better and do not mention of things to blur the reality and gain some audience.
Arguing civilization’s is ok. But if you are about to far then using chat messages are better choice.

I never ever said something like that and i won’t…Its clear for me that these nomadic people are decendants of same origin. Even today most of Central Asian steppes people are Turkic oriented (compared to population) it is scientific fact like it or not…Khazakhs,Kirghizs,Tatars,Kipchaks,Turkomans,Azerbaijanis,Uzbekhs etc etc etc…
Being Turkish or Turkic is not only DNA thing… Its more likely to be cultural&language stuff…People speaking Turkic and having Turkic based culture&lifestyla is called Turkic&Turkish. Thats all dude.I dont care about the rest much.And game have enough of these Turkic civilisations.FOR MY THINKİNG !

[quote=“UpmostRook9474, post:68, topic:205663”]
I find that your arguments are often based on “feelings”, “think

Of course it is. Shouldn’t it be ? 11

Thats clearly why i send priv. message u got it ?

i clearly never said that.I just said 4 Turkic civ is enough ! I love playing Turks&Tatars also Cumans&Huns…Just said 4 is ok !
Turks of course has huge influence troughout the history!..They are supposed to be in game with 1-2 civs maybe 3 is also ok but 4 is limit. If you add more it would be unnessesary. Please be carefull about what i said.

I understood and approve that with zero hesitation.

i agreed with that also.

Yet 4 Turkic civ is enogh still.

You didnt aay that, sure, however when I was looking at the least favourite civs poll you put every single Turkic civ as your least favourite (and I wasnt just looking at you btw, I was just looking in general)

Representing them with only one or two civs would be absolutely stupid.

Theres multiples powerful Turkic peoples that cannot be accurately represented by any Turkic civ (the early Khaganates). If we can have like 10 or 12 Germanic civs we can have 5 Turkic civs.

lol probably i thought it was favorite civ poll. Cuz Turks&Tatars are my favorites Turks&Cumans for close maps Tatars,Huns for open 11

Ok sure, I can acceot that. I still think that saying that a one or two civs would be enough to represent the Turks is quite an stretch. We could have an steppe lancer civ for example

We only have 4 indian civis too.

1 Like

Tbh its not that the game needs civs like the Kannadigas or the Gokturks to be “complete”, I just think they are strong candidates

:roll_eyes:

Ugh, seriously. This is a game forum, not a history debate class.

1 Like

Funny coming out of you who wants to make civi concepts “historically accurate”.