Devs should start tweaking landmarks

One of the reason the meta is not diverse is existence of underwhelming landmark choices.

ex) abbey of kings, tower of victory, burgrave palace, wynguard palace, elzbach palace etc…

6 Likes

besides the others that clearly need buffing, i wonder if this one would be fine, if the units you received were more worth it? ie if the english UT worked effectively on the treb, if the treb wasnt so lacklustre, or if england had a minor military buff for one of the remaining units(aside from ironclad)

iaw i dont think the landmark is necessarily poor, i just think the units arent that much to write home about…

yea because right now one landmark is much more viable than the other ones.

Funny how you listed zero Chinese Landmarks despite the fact that every Chinese Landmark needs changes. After the nerf to Clocktower, which was their only good Landmark, Chinese are the faction with the worst Landmarks in the game and the great ability to build twice as many terrible Landmarks as everyone else!

1 Like