i love quickmatch, i use it. Its the best improvement ive seen on aoe3. Please stop saying that nobody uses it (its stupid). Just go to leaderboards and youll see that many people appears on leaderboard
Note: In order to appear on leaderboard you need to play 10 games at least.
And i find a player in less than 1 minute
It’s not an improvement lol, what u saying dude
it’s in the original game from 2005, so it exist on aoe3 for 15 years xD
And it’s not even as good as the original QS where u could search in a reach of lvl.
And nobody use it on old version, even if there’s 700 players right now. It’s same the saturday when there’s 2500 players…
no, there were not leaderboards for quickmatch and im not sure if the match was allowed to be filmed
and lvl was only city level, which was so bad for the game, rank lvl now is done automatically which is an improvement
ofc u find game with qs now, game is one week old and there’s all the casuals, let’s see in 3 or 4 months 
see you on 3 months bro, well see
1 Like
There is a leaderboard on vanilla raulramirez…
it’s literally called lader on the menu, idk how u guys miss it
that leaderboard was for lobby games not only quickmatch. Now its leaderboard exclusively for quickmatch, now quickmatch takes importance, and rank its more real, because many people on aoe3CC just rank lvl playing versus some civs, and same map always
1 Like
Dude, i have something like 5000 hours in the game. I think i know what i’m talking about…
Trust me, nobody will play quicksearch for 10 years if they can’t pick civ or map. Most of the map sucks exept if u play them only very rarely.
Literally every old player is asking for rank in the lobby like it was in the original and on TAD.
1 Like
you could have 5000000 hours, that has nothing to do, the system is being tested
1 Like
every player is asking for it, but they dont want quickmatch to be removed
just showing score on leaderboard on lobby matches would be good
1 Like
i dont want to talk more, see you in 4months
1 Like
The system have been tested for 15 years.
->there’s currently 10 000 players on DE.
->there’s currently 2000 players on vanilla.
With 10 000 players, u can find a QS.
With 2000 on vanilla, nobody use it.
But it’s 10 000 after one week. What will happens to QS once the casuals with leave ?
And, anyway, it was the same on AOE2DE, no rank in lobby at launch.
People raged so much they added it months later cause the community was leaving.
It was tested, and it failed.
i told you, vanilla has a big different system, quickmatch there is useless. People use lobby.
In DE quickmatch has own leaderboards, not shared with lobby system
people still can show his score of leaderboard on lobby system , or lobby system could have a rank system different from quickmatch.
Quickmatch is for versatile players
Lobby is for those guys that always play same civ, same map, or choose convenient opponents, or want to play with friends or people of the same rank.
Quickmatch is a more realistic score, and more competitive.
Quickmatch should be used in order to classify to tournaments, if they add option to classify to tournaments by playing quickmatch, it wont die, competitive people will keep it alive
lobby system is just to play with same skill level people and hav efun
the only reason i wouldnt like that a different rank system is implemented on lobby system is because take soooooooo looooong to find a match becausehost kicks you, etc (this could be solved maybe if options to only accept certain range of skill to join a lobby match is implemented), and all people become separated. But if people want to play with people of the same level, then just go to quickmatch, after 10 games you will play with people of the same level.
But as the game is new they dont even know that after 10 people they will play with people of the same level on 1vs1, 2vs2 3vs3, 4vs4. Because the message that says “you will be on leaderboard after 10 games” is almost invisible
otehr option:
or more simple just allow to search name of player on leaderboard by writing it, and then host decides if kick player or not etc
1 Like
Nobody asking to remove QS, so I dont get ur point…
We want rank in the lobby, and the lobby counting for rank.
A ladder on QS : good news.
No rank on custom lobby ? Dead game…
1 Like
I have played many Quickmatch games. And to be honest I don’t find anything particularly unfair.
Indeed the premade teams have huge advantages like some deadly all-in rush combos, but it is also common in all the other strategy games. So If you don’t trust the random teammates, you can form a team with your friends. It is completely legal.
If you can’t find fairness in Quickmatch, I don’t believe the situation in a custom lobby would be better. Not to mention that the host can always pick his oppenents to grind elo, which would only cause more unnecessary unfairness. I think they can add a function to show the players’s elo in the lobby, but still Quickmatch should be the only way to get elo.
I love Quickmatch and there are already many
other players dedicating to Quickmatch as well. I hope the devs make the right decision. That’s it.
1 Like
Forcing player to play rank will harm aoe3 community . Most players don’t play for compitition , they play for fun .
Ranked game are too stressing for person to come and play after a hard day office work , or some life issue . They want good causal game and fun .
Imagine that person start a casual game and his team mate don’t make units , and he had to fight 1v2 and lose . Will he have fun ??? He will slowly get demotivated to play aoe , if he can’t have fun here .
Look at most games in eSports people play casual mode much more than ranked . People wants fun . They have a life , they can’t invest in getting better at something that probably not gonna give them much .
U can’t have played many Quickmatch games in 1 week. 30 games isnt “many” ^^
I have 5000 games or something, and I still dont know the game so well than my friends with 10 000 games and way more for some.
I’d say u start to understand things after 1000 games, and only if u try to improve ur gameplay.
But stop saying we want to remove Quicksearch, nobody want. We want rank in lobby, and we’ll get it as they got it on AOE2DE… cause it’s the basics of ESO. We just dont want to wait a year for it.
1 Like
Here’s an imagine from google to how eso was working before.
Seriously, isnt it 1000x better ? U choose the game by ur lvl + the friendlist + all the rest…
3 Likes
At this point with zero communication from the devs, I don’t even know if they’re still working on the game.
It probably didn’t get the sales they anticipated and they probably have a lot of debt to manage.
Hopefully to ensure the longevity of the game(good for revenue), they’ll fix the multiplayer browser issues before they move on.
Played the game for 34,4 hours now. There is no statistic where i see any improvement. For me (and many others) lobby games are their way to play this game. Seriously. Please give us a ranking system.