Fair enough. Although I think Burmese needs EA. Worth to mention their UT “Howdah” literally means the seat mounted on top of EA.
And Cham to have a full 2 civs DLC.
Fair enough. Although I think Burmese needs EA. Worth to mention their UT “Howdah” literally means the seat mounted on top of EA.
And Cham to have a full 2 civs DLC.
and the Mon
Tbh I really like the Mon but they feel way too obscure even compared to any of the civilizations I usually defend
I just cant imagine the devs adding them
And Cham to have a full 2 civs DLC.
Yeah, I remember something about the Chams always having an elephant at the center of their military formations…
Siamese and deccani the dynasties of rajas dlc.
Tbh I really like the Mon but they feel way too obscure even compared to any of the civilizations I usually defend
I just cant imagine the devs adding them
The Mon are already in the Burmese and Khmer campaigns.
(I think the story about Wareru could be a very cool Mon campaign)
May I know why?
The Mon are already in the Burmese and Khmer campaigns.
The are represented by Burmese civ with their UU and UT.
Uh… I think you may be thinking about Manipuri rather than Mon, because that’s where the Arambai and Manipur Cavalry come from. As for the Howdah, it isn’t reallly specific to one people in history.
Idk I just think theres way too much in South East Asia to add and the Mon are usually overshadowed by the Burmese and Thai which are the nations that replaced them
I also think they are less known than the Chams or Shan but that may just be my impressoon
Oops. My mistake. Since both of them are represented by Burmese in the game, I mixed them.
Mons (Pegu) are better represented by Khmer. Because they relate linguistically and architecture wise.