There’s nothing wrong with having one most powerful option, if the exiled prince combined with a certain civ is too strong, the civ doesn’t get exiled prince anymore, take Spain for example, it would be absolutely broken if Spain had the exiled prince, an age up time just after 6 minutes, that’s why the civs that would be OP if they had exiled prince, simply don’t have it, I think the way it is now with some civs not having it and those that do have it, although in a discord server a heard someone mention that the highest win rate civs are, Aztec
(not really sure how, Aztec feel garbage) Spain, (proves my point, a civ without exiled prince can still be a perfectly viable age 3 civ)
And German( feel like German makes sense, the shipments they can get are amazing) so what I’m trying to argue is that a no exiled prince civ can be a perfectly viable age 3 civ and Spain is a perfect example of that. Also china is another example, even though China doesn’t ff as often as Spain, it’s still viable without exiled prince.
2 Likes