That doesn’t prove anything I’m afraid. Saying X civ was arguably more important than Y civ isn’t me “admitting” that X civ was unimportant. I could say the Byzantines were more important than the Sicilians, does that mean I think the Byzantines are a tiny civ who shouldn’t be included?
I also note that you have completely ignored my second point.
That proves everything…
I do not have to go into all of your sentences, only where I know well and what I want to say. Your second point also does not relate to the first point.
I do not have to go into all of your sentences, only where I know well and what I want to say. Your second point also does not relate to the first point.
That’s a shame - I would really like to know your thoughts on it!
No overall not.
I think that Slavs should be renamed to Rus, because Slavs is a “much” to general term.
I know the question was not asked to me, but personnally I would go for at least three African dlc’s and two American ones.
East Africa: Kanembus, Nubians, Somalis
South Africa: Kongolese, Shonas, Swahilis
West Africa: Soninke, Songhai, Yorubas, Edos… and possibly others (Hausas, Mossis, Fons, Jolofs… this area will probably never be covered entirely)
Central Ameria: Tarascans, Zapotecs, Mictecs… maybe Toltecs
South America: Chimu, Mapuche, Muisca
In Africa, you could add Wolofs, Songhais, Mossi, Yoruba, Edo, Igbo, Hausa, Kanem, Bornu, Alodia, Makuria Kongolese, Zimbabweans, Swahili, Ajuraan, Akan, Luba, Lunda, Fula…
Malians and Ethiopians are some kind of ridiculous umbrella civilization supposedly representing West Africa resp. East Africa while sharing one architecture set.
I think there’s some areas in Asia which could definitely benefit from more civs like Central Asia, the Sinosphere, the Indosphere as well as insular Asia.
The Inka campaign is a sign there’s some off-priorities. In South America alone, you could add Chimu, Muisca, Huari, Tiwahuanako, Moche, Mapuche, Tupi etc.
Central America is also missing a lot of civs ranging from Tarascans, Zapotecs, Mixtecs, Toltecs, Tlaxcaltecs etc.
North America, my personal favourite possible future DLC zone could have the Mississippians, Hitsatsonim, Hohokam , Tlingit etc
Oceania could have T’ui Tonga, Maori, Samoans etc.
The population and cultural diversity in every one of those areas is huge and they’d be perfect occassions to add new architecture sets for each new culture zone. Campaigns would be based on oral traditions of their respective regions.
I really hope they’ll focus on those next. Can’t wait for a second African/American DLC.
Well, I think the next one will probably be either about China or the Caucasus, but I would also like to have new stuff for the most underrepresented continents, especially Africa.
Yes, perhaps there could be DLC for Central and South America, and then West, East and Southern Africa. Perhaps even North America too at a push.
Would a second SE Asia DLC be a good idea too?
Definitely. We don’t even a Siamese/Tai civ at the moment!
Siamese, Cham and Tagalog? I may have to rethink my DLC ideas, as the possibilities are limitless and who knows when FE will end the game for good!
Also, two Asian DLCs that can have a Korean and Japanese campaign each, and European DLCs that can have Slav, Viking and Roman campaigns.
The Mon could also be considered, as well as the Javanese (which would obviously be split from the Malays). For the Philippines, I honestly don’t know how (or even if) they should be repredented (Visayans seem to be a strong candidates).
I definitely think they should pick only a few of those. We don’t necessarily want one region to become oversaturated, or we’ll have another Europe on our hands.
I could see potentially the Siamese and Chams as possibilities. Also Tibetans, Jurchens, and Khitans. Maybe also Kazakhs.
Yes, I think you could easily add the Chimu and Mapuche. Don’t know much about anyone else.
Yes, the Zapotecs and Toltecs would be a good choice.
I think maybe the Mississippians, Iroquois, and Algonquin could be civs, sharing a new architecture set.
I think all the Polynesian civs should be condensed into one civ, as there isn’t enough historical material available (or even significance) to create separate civs for all the Polynesian cultures. This is a rare case where an umbrella civ makes a lot of sense. I could see the other Oceania civ being the Micronesians. Maybe the Filipinos can be added as a new SEA civ.
Man, I hope it’s all about the Caucasus! Though I suppose that would mean my mod idea would be obsolete…
Without order
DLC 1
Venetian and Florence → Italians change to Milanese
DLC 2
Kongoleses and Benin
DLC 3
Jurchen,Tibetans and Afghans
And no more civs after the 50th one
I see you like yo live dangerously xD
I’d love to see Chams, Mons, Tais (because I am Tai Lue so it would be nice since it encompass many Tai folks) and Javanese. Would be cool to get a Buddhist temple rather than Hindu temple for the Tais and Burmese.
No, “they” have done nothing of the sort. You’re the person who’s actually spreading lies and insults.
Correct, but I will always stand up against bullies who attack other people for no reason and will support their victims.
Sure, you continue to show themselves in bad and provocative kind.
No, you are the actual evil, because you start to insult again and again.
Thank you for agree with me.
If I point out an misconduct, it is an usual behavior from me. But your behavior and that of your helpers is harmful like a virus, against that I have to fight.
You are talking about madeup dramas, if we can clearly read, that you wrote just evil things.
They keep damaging my reputation by always attacking me. Do not always twist the truth.
No everything I have ever written here, is legal. But ALL of your sentences violate the Terms of use.
You have always been evil and now you are evil again.
You are the issue, that is clear.
Yes, I hope you leave already tonight this forum, then peace will return.
You are the bad guy again. You started to meddle concerning my valid complaint for no reason like last time…