WHAT?
Just look at this game:
Hera has anything that should take that group easily but the Arambai spam fend off it , without even being touched by the cavalry lol, try to do the same with conqs and they will peroform way worse here.
Yea Arambai is hard to mass, sure, Arambai need a nerf cmon, being able to be massed in that way plus acting like a stupidly cheap siege onager with mobility, and no costing food? what a trash design.
Here’s another example by Daut:
Seriously 11
Yeah Arambai are pretty garbage now, unless your opponent commits some bad mistake, the unit is not viable.
Hera was playing the civ with one of the worst xbow / skirm lines, ofc he will struggle vs Arambai
Yeah a game with one of the best civs with one of the best Knights in the game will struggle vs it, having much better eco, yeah-_-
How often do you actually lose to Arambai in your games? Given their low pick rate, how often do you even encounter them? If they are so good, why does the civ have the lowest pick rate? etc.
Arambai’s worse than it was.
That doesn’t make it a bad unit. The elite version has been buffed in a serious way because then you care way more about the anti-unit than you do the anti-building.
Will the cycle of asking for buffs and nerfs to Arambai never end?
Well, one of the users that started two of the current burmese threads was banned yesterday
Well you can apply this question to almost everything into this forum 11