Incas tweak

[ReanuKeeves00]

@phoenix1089

never said they arent

So what is your problem then?

@phoenix1089

wow you can one trick a civ, congrats. i can do the same with spanish, doesnt mean they are remotely meta enough

Tip of the day: Making use of a civ’s advantages are often a good way to secure an advantage

@phoenix1089

by towering them?

it basically turns a 4v4 into a 3v3, but if the enemy civ is better pick, it is worth it

[SauravT]

I have a question. If you are playing a 4vs4, you will definitely have 1 Paladin civ (or Bulgarians or Malians), and sometimes even 2 of these. The Incas can play a role by countering both Cavalry and Infantry (usually Champions/Halberdiers supporting the heavy Cavalry) with Kamayuks.

Why “waste” the civ by towering and withering out?

[ReanuKeeves00]

Because sometimes the enemy might have a civ that is more valuable than the incas would be. For example, we always trush/douche goth players, just because that civ alone is such a pain to deal with.

for 4v4 we usually have a dedicated trush/douche player on our side

[JokerPenguin593]

@SauravT

Villagers affected by Infantry Blacksmith techs” changed to “Villagers affected by Infantry techs”. A minor change. This adds Villagers getting a general speed buff by Squires (Castles Age, not a trush) and Arson (also Castle Age). A slight quirck is that Arson adds +2 attack vs Standard buildings (class 21) but Villagers do not have any attack against it. So Arson adds +2 attacks vs Buildings (class 11), so is negated by Masonry and building armor.

There are one more infantry tech (not counting supplies): tracking.
Since definitive edition, tracking is researched by free upon reaching feudal age by all civs. It provides more LOS to infantry.
With this, inca villagers would became too much similar to koreans ones for my personal taste.