Legacy content has been adjusted before. Wonders, even units etc.
Itâs a difference to change 1 single civ than to change 23, especially if they made an extra skin for Winged Hussars. Should be enough like it was enough for the Magyar Huszar.
another post from FurtherLime complaining about Lithuanian changes. You donât even know the stats of the winged hussars, so pls donât talk about balancing them.
Is simple, the fact that Lithuanians need to lose Blast furnace and that Polish UT that gives trample damage alone are red flags to tell the unit is potentially broken.
Only in your eyes, first we shall see how it plays out. If cavalry as such will be their only strength, the civ will still be balanced.
You mean OP in low elo but *meh" in competitive? ^^
just speculation from you
Perhaps. But low elo shouldnât be the point of reference anyway.
It is historical fact that Polish hussars units were also created in Lithuania,
Youâre about two years too late, I think people have accepted that by now.
Youâre about two years too late, I think people have accepted that by now.
It is never too late for a true fan. Accepting something wrong is awful.
Maybe a little offtopic, but i canât help it. I am actually much more tilted about Ethiopian siege - thatâs like giving gunpowder to a dark age civ. At least Celts had trebuchets (those are, technically, Torsion Engines) in King Arthur movieâŠbut Ethiopians, who had basically no siege at all, come with a FULL siege tree as well as bbcs + super blast UTâŠand devs said âwe did it for funâ. I mean, ethiopians of all civs? Thatâs basically a flip off towards Chinese, Tatars, Mongols, Turks and Europan nations.
Iâd much rather see them with some powerful infantry technology that would give bonus against buildingsâŠthan this. If Celts are âfantasyâ/âunhistoricalâ civ, then ethiopians are just that, squared.