# New DLC - The Viking Sagas

**URL:** <https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281>\
**Category:** II - Discussion\
**Created:** [July 30, 2026, 5:17pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281 "2026-07-30T17:17:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 75

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skadidesu](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/skadidesu/32/172243_2.png) [@Skadidesu](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/Skadidesu)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2026, 6:54am UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281/1524 "2026-09-30T06:54:23Z")

</div>

In some ways yes but also no. Seeing the Middle Ages as an isolated time period from Antiquity and Modernity is kinda wrong for Europe too and also kinda right for other parts of the world. The Middle East in particular has almost the same concept of the Middle Ages as Europe, maybe even more clearly with the spread of Islam at the beginning and the rise of the Ottoman Empire at the end.

East Asia is absolutely a popular setting. There are more people from East Asia on the Internet and on Steam then from Europe nowadays so that is also a huge market. There is as much if not more written history from that time Period from East Asia alone. Southern Asia too.

Of course Sub Sahara Africa and the Americas is less well documented and they didn’t really have “Middle Ages” there.

Despite Africa and America needing Regional Skins the most I think Asia and the Middle East would benefit the most. The generic unit rosters logically already makes a lot of sense for those regions it just looks visually out of place.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WhiteMagick4](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/whitemagick4/32/29597_2.png) [@WhiteMagick4](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/WhiteMagick4)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2026, 8:13am UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281/1525 "2026-09-30T08:13:27Z")

</div>

I liked TLC a lot. Maybe it did not chart in the top 100 because of the timing of its release. It does not mean it did not sell well.

But admittedly, Vikings are much more popular than South American civs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skadidesu](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/skadidesu/32/172243_2.png) [@Skadidesu](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/Skadidesu)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2026, 8:21am UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281/1526 "2026-09-30T08:21:47Z")

</div>

Looking at the achievements [Steam Community :: Age of Empires II: Definitive Edition :: Achievements](https://steamcommunity.com/stats/813780/achievements)

Currently the victory with Mapuche has 1.2% while victory with Varangians is still only at 0.5%. We will see how much that will change in the coming months.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UnAutreVoyage](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/unautrevoyage/32/158016_2.png) [@UnAutreVoyage](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/UnAutreVoyage)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2026, 8:50am UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281/1527 "2026-09-30T08:50:15Z")

</div>

The idea is not to have or not middle age. The concept is born in Europe to describe a period of European history.

Then, historian started to mitigate this notion with late antiquity, as well as the transition between middle age and early modern, as well as periods inside the middle age itself.

Finally, came obviously the question of outside Europe. Some historians tries to adapt this notion elsewhere, like in Japan, but it’s if course not the same and a bit artificial.

But obviously, it’s interesting to have non European civs (they existed at the same time after all and sometimes meet with Europeans), but they are not medieval per se.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skadidesu](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/skadidesu/32/172243_2.png) [@Skadidesu](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/Skadidesu)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2026, 10:00am UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281/1528 "2026-09-30T10:00:50Z")

</div>

AoE2 always included none European civs and was never a Europe only game, unlike AoE3 which actually only had European civs at release. The cover of the game (which is your profile picture) already included a Samurai.

So I don’t think that was ever a major issue.

AoE1 had barely and European civs but yet a lot of the generic units looked Greek. Though some clearly look Egyptian (Chariots) or even Asian (Composite Bowman). AoE2 released with most generic units looking European with the exception of Cavalry Archers and Camel Riders.

Of course there are many people that primarily think of Knights and Castles when they hear Middle Ages but the world is not just Europe, neither back then nor now. Many people from Asia has a completely different idea what Middle Ages are to them. Also people from the West are a lot more interested in Asian history then they were 25 years ago when the game released. Settings like Japan or China have massively increased in popularity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Crossil](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/crossil/32/213977_2.png) [@Crossil](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/Crossil)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2026, 10:53am UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281/1529 "2026-09-30T10:53:43Z")

</div>

> [@Skadidesu](#):
>
> I wonder how much of the reason why people prefer European DLC is because every civ outside of Europe looks really odd because of all the European looking generic units.

None. There’s no one complaining about it across any of the DLCs or even base game reviews. The reason why TLC sold less is because there’s simply not as much interest in that content with the general audience.

> [@UnAutreVoyage](#):
>
> The idea is not to have or not middle age. The concept is born in Europe to describe a period of European history.
> 
> Then, historian started to mitigate this notion with late antiquity, as well as the transition between middle age and early modern, as well as periods inside the middle age itself.
> 
> Finally, came obviously the question of outside Europe. Some historians tries to adapt this notion elsewhere, like in Japan, but it’s if course not the same and a bit artificial.

Essentially. But it really doesn’t matter. AoE is a series of games that, imo, depict a specific time period, rather than a historiographic periodization of a certain region.

Late 4th century until late 16th century is the period to depict.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SirT\_Efaisto](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/sirt_efaisto/32/166567_2.png) [@SirT\_Efaisto](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/SirT_Efaisto)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2026, 11:04am UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281/1530 "2026-09-30T11:04:14Z")

</div>

> [@Crossil](#):
>
> None. There’s no one complaining about it across any of the DLCs or even base game reviews

At least I am. 🙋‍♂️  
(… but still I bought TLC.)

I just don’t like playing the civs that much.  
There’s the broken immersion, and also the Guecha Warrior is too weak for its cost and supposed anti-archer role. I have not played that much with Konas, but they also feel weak. Tupi are fine only if I’m using UU’s or regional units.

I love the Champis, both in visuals and in gameplay.

On the first week after release I saw a player using Muisca Arbalesters and Pikemen with Trebuchets. They were winning, that’s great, but that’s not Muisca at all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skadidesu](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/skadidesu/32/172243_2.png) [@Skadidesu](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/Skadidesu)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2026, 11:20am UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281/1531 "2026-09-30T11:20:10Z")

</div>

> [@Crossil](#):
>
> None. There’s no one complaining about it across any of the DLCs or even base game reviews.

Not complaining doesn’t equal to being happy about something.

A think like unfitting units is more of a subconscious thing. I played AoE2 for decades not thinking about regional skins but somehow it always felt worse to play as a none European civs. After AoE2DE came out the graphics of the game got a lot more detailed which made the units more clearly European looking then before so it started looking out of place for me.

> [@SirT\_Efaisto](#):
>
> On the first week after release I saw a player using Muisca Arbalesters and Pikemen with Trebuchets. They were winning, that’s great, but that’s not Muisca at all.

It doesn’t help when units have bonuses for units that look out of place. Mayans and Aztecs of course belong to that group too. Malians and Ethiopians are big offenders of this too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darth\_Paladin\_213](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/darth_paladin_213/32/211508_2.png) [@Darth\_Paladin\_213](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/Darth_Paladin_213)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2026, 11:55am UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281/1532 "2026-09-30T11:55:26Z")

</div>

> [@Mahazona](#):
>
> everybody likes vikings.

Well…I’m not a fan of Infantry. Very good for Infantry-lovers, though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Siegelad4112](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/siegelad4112/32/217608_2.png) [@Siegelad4112](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/Siegelad4112)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2026, 3:11pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281/1533 "2026-09-30T15:11:12Z")

</div>

Same, got bored with the infantryfest while other units get neglected tho Varangian Jarl is a good unit to have.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UnAutreVoyage](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/unautrevoyage/32/158016_2.png) [@UnAutreVoyage](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/UnAutreVoyage)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2026, 5:35pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281/1534 "2026-09-30T17:35:21Z")

</div>

I opened the game for the first time since august, and I see my main menu is still TLC. It there an official Viking Sagas main menu mod? I can’t find it… And i would like my menu to be up to date 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RatcicleFan](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/ratciclefan/32/115119_2.png) [@RatcicleFan](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/RatcicleFan)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2026, 6:26pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281/1535 "2026-09-30T18:26:05Z")

</div>

> [@Skadidesu](#):
>
> It doesn’t help when units have bonuses for units that look out of place. Mayans and Aztecs of course belong to that group too. Malians and Ethiopians are big offenders of this too.

Don’t forget Japanese and Huns having bonuses for something they wouldn’t have had (Trebuchets).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Crossil](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/crossil/32/213977_2.png) [@Crossil](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/Crossil)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2026, 8:09pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281/1536 "2026-09-30T20:09:11Z")

</div>

> [@Skadidesu](#):
>
> A think like unfitting units is more of a subconscious thing.

Nah, nah, nah, call it what it is. This is your pet issue, and you’re actively overblowing it by saying people subconsciously don’t like it and just aren’t aware of it.

That’s not why Last Chieftains didn’t sell. It didn’t sell because the average customer doesn’t know squat about these people.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AlphaCreator727](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/alphacreator727/32/62674_2.png) [@AlphaCreator727](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/AlphaCreator727)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2026, 12:22pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281/1537 "2026-10-01T12:22:50Z")

</div>

It may be in your mods already. Probably your TLC mod has higher priority. (Don’t remember the name of the mod)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darth\_Paladin\_213](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/darth_paladin_213/32/211508_2.png) [@Darth\_Paladin\_213](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/Darth_Paladin_213)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2026, 12:40pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281/1538 "2026-10-01T12:40:03Z")

</div>

> [@AlphaCreator727](#):
>
> Don’t remember the name of the mod

**• [TheVikingSagas] Main Menu**

• [TheVikingSagas] Main Menu Music

• [TheLastChieftans] Main Menu

(All by AoE Official)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Skadidesu](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/skadidesu/32/172243_2.png) [@Skadidesu](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/Skadidesu)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2026, 2:53pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281/1539 "2026-10-01T14:53:02Z")

</div>

> [@Crossil](#):
>
> Nah, nah, nah, call it what it is. This is your pet issue, and you’re actively overblowing it by saying people subconsciously don’t like it and just aren’t aware of it.

I never claimed I know how big the impact of it is. It evidently annoys me and some other people on this forum, while it evidently is not an issue for others here. So both groups of people exist. But no one knows which group is bigger in the great scheme of things. 99% of players are not posting here, like I don’t post in 95% of forums of games I play.

The even harder question to answer is how many people are subconsciously aware of it but never actively thought about it. And then how many people don’t mind the current state of things but would end up being happy with the change. Similar to Elite Unique Unit skins. Only a few people were asking for it but in the end most people liked the change overall. Most complaints I heard were for a few specific skins that got a little too much Gold, but almost everyone was happy with the overall change.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MatM1996](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/matm1996/32/29566_2.png) [@MatM1996](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/MatM1996)\
**Post date:** [October 3, 2026, 5:40am UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281/1540 "2026-10-03T05:40:26Z")

</div>

> [@Skadidesu](#):
>
> unlike AoE3 which actually only had European civs at release.

And yet AoE 3 was planned to have Chinese and Japanese civs at launch, but they scrapped it due to lack of time (and because they moved the setting from Eurasia to America in 2004) and left it for The Asian Dynasties in 2007…🤷‍♂️

- The [Chinese](https://ageofempires.fandom.com/wiki/Chinese_(Age_of_Empires_III) "Chinese (Age of Empires III)") and the [Japanese](https://ageofempires.fandom.com/wiki/Japanese_(Age_of_Empires_III) "Japanese (Age of Empires III)") were designed to be playable civilizations in the vanilla game, since there are references to the flags of these civilizations in the texture files of the vanilla game (`flag_china.ddt` and `flag_japan.ddt`). However, they were cut off at a very early stage of development and reappeared later in _[The Asian Dynasties](https://ageofempires.fandom.com/wiki/Age_of_Empires_III:_The_Asian_Dynasties "Age of Empires III: The Asian Dynasties")_.

> [@Skadidesu](#):
>
> Settings like Japan or China have massively increased in popularity.

The good thing is that both China and Japan have always been present in the saga since AoE 1 (like Shang and Yamato)…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UnAutreVoyage](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/unautrevoyage/32/158016_2.png) [@UnAutreVoyage](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/UnAutreVoyage)\
**Post date:** [October 3, 2026, 6:13pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281/1541 "2026-10-03T18:13:36Z")

</div>

> [@Darth\_Paladin\_213](#):
>
> [TheVikingSagas] Main Menu

It’s strange as it doesnt appear in the list when I look for it

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SMUM15236](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/smum15236/32/29763_2.png) [@SMUM15236](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/SMUM15236)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2026, 6:12pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281/1542 "2026-10-06T18:12:57Z")

</div>

![download](https://forums.ageofempires.com/uploads/default/original/3X/e/9/e9276c31d6d60e2d46ae117cbb01a465371e2bb8.png)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EricTheRed283](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/ericthered283/32/178633_2.png) [@EricTheRed283](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/EricTheRed283)\
**Post date:** [October 15, 2026, 5:08pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281/1543 "2026-10-15T17:08:56Z")

</div>

[![](https://img.youtube.com/vi/MOajCCWskRE/maxresdefault.jpg "The real Winners and Losers of the last patch (AoE2)") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOajCCWskRE)

End part of the video talks about the new civs.

[Previous page](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281.md?page=74)

[Next page](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/new-dlc-the-viking-sagas/288281.md?page=76)
