POLL: Should the Variant Civilization Names Change?

Nothing wrong with variants assuming they are functionally different.

Why not save on creating all that art and models and music and voice lines? That allows them to make way more civs that still play in unique ways.

The only issue is they have chosen some strange and inconsistent naming for them.

2 Likes

The name “Jade Empire” is very peculiar to people in the Asian cultural circle. It sounds like using “Fish and Chips Empire” to refer to England, “Leather Bag Empire” to refer to France, “Beer Sausage Empire” to refer to HRE, and “Matryoshka Doll Empire” to refer to RUS. This is its absurdity. “Jade Empire” can be used as a background for mythological stories or as a title for travel magazine articles, But in reality, no country will use any object to refer to itself.

5 Likes

Variants are good for pumping more content with less effort and keep the community engaged
 but the way they are doing this is not good

Some of the names are questionable but when it comes to the idea of getting variant civilizations sounds great!

They have to work differently enough to make it make sense but I’ll wait until we get all the information on how they will work and play out before anything can be said.

1 Like

Variants in my opinion is good, as it allows the devs to create civs that are not too different from existing civs.

If they are properly fleshed out in terms of uniqueness it can allow for more creative freedom. Rather than outright never creating civs because they are too similar.

Example: England having Wales/Scotland etc as a variant.

^ Just an example.

BUT it remains to see how these new variant civs differ from their main counterparts


Also more appropriate naming :wink:

2 Likes

I think making 4 variant civ probably as much work as 1 full civ.

So its great we getting more content otherwise would probably be just 3 new civs instead of 6.

The naming isn’t even official, its like semi-official.

They probably just need to add the civ name in front like
French - Jeanne d’arc
Abbasyd - Sultan’s army. (Ayyubid would be better though)

Maybe a rename for jade empire and we’re good.

1 Like

Semi-official you say?

In a game that has 10 civilizations, I do not see the need to scramble to make up shit just so you can have 4 more selections of civilizations. The issue here is they will be delivering it without heart. HRE’s “variant” features reskinned english knights and reskinned Landsknecht.

No new buildings. No new music. No new art. No new actual unit models. There may be one or two, but I have seen what is availabie in the editor, and they will surely mostly pull from what already exists, just like they have been doing with the recent “new” unique units.

To top it off, they are 2 years in dramatically changing a fundamental part of AoE. Adding heroe units to these civilizations, as if it is AoE3. Not a fan. I always disliked hero units. This is an unnecessary change of design. I would have taken a third civilization over this poor attempt at trying to fill an expansion everytime.

6 Likes

What strikes me as the worst part of this is not actually the content.

It is the fact that this was greenlit by actual people in their offices. There is someone actively making bad calls, and has been for quite a while now. This is exactly what I mean when I say they have no idea what they are doing with this game, and it is unfortunate to see this continue.

10 Likes

You are assuming that they are copy paste civs when in reality only the people that are under NDA know how they work and they say its different enough to call them a new civ.

How about you wait for details before taking your assumptions and make them into facts that aren’t true?

1 Like

I thought it was incredible, and very interesting, the important thing is to have fun. Incredible. Just the names I didn’t like!

2 Likes

Reskinned HRE knights*

But so far we just don’t know, you wouldn’t be able to find the new units in the editor.

I reserve my complaints on the content after seeing it, it is strange bashing something we have limited availability to.

Hopefully, and here is a bit of copium, is that there is enough variety, unique units and ofc new unit models for these unique units. I can agree if they are really low effort, remains to be seen though

1 Like

No, actually, they are reskinned “Lithuanian” Knights. And yes, I can find many of these suppoused new unit’s model that they are based off in the editor, for I have spent much time there–I for instance unveiled the Rus Kievian walls for all to see.

image
“New units”


Lithuanian Knight


For comparison, HRE on left, Castle age English Knight in the middle, Imperial to the right

You really think they would do something new when they are literally making Landsknecht’s swords and their spearmen’s guisarme golden to make them “unique”? What a joke.

I can’t believe people fall for this. No wonder these companies makes millions when all it takes for someone to be excited is to recolour something. Like I have stated in the past, this is no different than the recent introduction of “new” units like the Ghulam, Ghazi Raider, Keshik and the english King–all who already existed as unused assets in the editor. Yes, very new indeed.

7 Likes

I see the weapons going through their helmets issue hasn’t been addressed. Sigh.

3 Likes

That is just an editor thing. I couldn’t be bothered to assign proper animations to them.

1 Like

I will enlighten you some, the “Lithuanian” campaign civ is literally the HRE roster of units (We all have access to the editor). The comparison you made is of the Imperial age HRE knight, Castle age and the Imperial age knights. Also you wrote “HRE’s “variant” features reskinned english knights” this is simply incorrect.

Also we have no idea what is a unique unit or not for the variant civs and there are no expansion stuff in the editor, they would have to push a Steam update to even include them in the game. So it is literally impossible for you to access anything in the expansion unless the devs added them before.

I mean the Ghulam, Ghazi, Keshik ec etc. Aren’t new in the same sense as the expansion stuff, you are aware for this right? They are just rebalanced and mechanically changed, which is to be expected, simply from a gameplay perspective redesigned. Also the Ghulam did have a shield change :wink:

Lastly, if the units themselves aren’t unique units per say, but just simply the same units (as there will be similarities to the original civ). But as a way to differentiate them from the “normal” HRE units or whatever, that is absolutely fine or if Order of the Dragon have some unique upgrade that gives them the black armor that is completely fine. As long as they have some unique units or so added along, which is very probable, no issues there.

We’ve already seen evidence of a new unit btw with the horse archer, which is probably not a Byzantine or Japanese unit. Soooo I mean that kinda disproves your point already.

4 Likes

Use your eyes. The imperial HRE knight is not the same model.

If you’re willing to close your eyes despite all of that then there is nothing more I can say to you.

6 Likes

Castle Age - HRE Knight → Order of the Dragon use this knight model in black. Might even be a non-upgraded knight for all we know.
Imperial Age - HRE Knight

What is the issues here, also you skipped like the whole reply I made. They use the HRE castle age Men at Arms as well.

1 Like

Having variants that are similar but still different was unavoidable and it’s not really an AoE 2 thing as AoE 3 does this as well with culture groups.
You’ve got the Asian Civs that share the Wonder mechanic that works like Landmarks, you’ve got Mexico and US that get different cards for their age up choices, you’ve got the american civs that have the WarChief in common etc.
I don’t get the outrage here.

1 Like

Yes, this I agree with. Which are
 reskinned models.

Did you forget what we were discussing? There is nothing new here.

1 Like

But you are aware that these don’t have to be unique units for the Order of the Dragon? Doesn’t matter if they are reskinned or not. I gave you a very good reply as to why that could be the case, but you kinda skipped that part and went into the “You are blind” - TheAchronic, 2023 argument which is quite unnecessary.

You’ve gotten at the very least 3 facts wrong.

And you are talking about campaign civs that use the HRE roster which is kinda irrelevant to the variant civs as these aren’t campaign civs to begin with.

They very clearly advertised the Variant civs to have shared units, but also having unique units. We don’t know which they are or what they look like. These shared units, in the case of HRE have black armor, that doesn’t mean that they ARE the unique units. We simply don’t know as they haven’t shown a lot about these.

What we DO know is that there is a new unit, that looks different than other units and that is the horse archer supplied in the screenshot above.