I made some modifications to the post based on the comments of some members. My intention is to make the reworking of the British civilization as accurate as possible, focusing mainly on the mechanics of the mansions and the evolution of the longbowmen, whom I renamed Yeoman, since the latter make more sense in the course of the game.
Their ideas are generally very good. I always wish that the British also had a more unique 4 and 5 age, standing out in the industry more than average, similar to the United States.
1 Like
Historical accuracy is the least important thing in this particular case. I prefer that each player has the freedom to choose whether they want to represent a modernized civilization or a more âclassicalâ one. Players need freedom of choice, and limiting it always results in overly boring games.
In my opinion, Age of Empires III is the best game in the franchise because of the freedom the cards offer and because it allows you to play and customize each civilization to your liking (although I think it has room for improvement).
1 Like
Are you saying that transitioning from archaic to modern goes against the gameâs philosophy? Actually, itâs ideal, and much better because each era is more uniquely represented.
Above all, a civilization that covers the entire period the game recreates shouldnât be limited to using medieval units during the industrial era. Thereâs a better sense of progression when more advanced units make older ones obsolete.
Archaic units are fine for civilizations that donât have other options.
No, Iâm saying that every player should have the option to play with the unit they like best, and if they want to play longbowmen up to Imperial rank, thatâs just as acceptable as those who want to play Ragers.
Simply put, if you donât like playing longbowmen in Industrial or Imperial rank, thatâs perfectly fine, but let those who do want to use them have the option to do so.
In my opinion, abandoning archaic weapons for firearms better reflects the arms race. It makes much more sense.
1 Like
Yo: Esp
Claramente no nos vamos a pones de acuerdo, tenemos enfoque diferentes de lo que es mĂĄs importante. Âżpodemos estar de acuerdo en que estamos en desacuerdo?
Google Traductor: Eng
Clearly weâre not going to agree; we have different approaches to whatâs most important. Can we agree that we disagree?
si sirbe de algo los Yeoman reemplazan a los arcos largos pero siguen teniendo la habilidad de utilizar el arco lo que los combierte en los susesores espirituales de dichas unidades, mi intencion es darle a los arcos largos una mejor durabilidad en el juego sin tener que eliminarlos completamente con la tarjeta de rangers, pienso que los arcos largos y los rangers pueden convivir hasta la era imperial pero la unica manera de hacer esto posible es actualizando a los arcos largos genericos por una unidad mas moderna como la que inclui en la publicasion, si gustas dale una revisada a las estadisticas de los Yeoman y te daras cuenta que con todas las mejoras que les implante pueden suplantar sin ningun problema a los arcos largos y mejor aun por que al tener el rol de campesino los puedes seguir utilizando el resto de la partida y tambien los puedes utilizar en enboscadas a tu ciudad o para inscursiones por parte del enemigo, piensa que son algo parecido a los sansculottes cuando los mejoras al final de la partida
If you wanna a stronger bonus, maybe they could get âyou get X thing per Y houses you ownâ
Copying Chinese Village cards tho.
Im disaggree on buffing euros tho
2 Likes