Thanks that was very informative
1 Like
Weâre in the age of Wikipedia!
1 Like
Then why do people share civ ideas here? Devs can read from Wikipedia.
In fact they do, even wrong accounts at times like it happened with Thirisadai if Iâm not wrong.
So that developers know what people want.
This was certainly the case with the TMR DLC.
The matter of fact is he himself is unable to find much data of clothes and architecture for the said civs so he is avoiding to engage. He wants to " act smart ". All he has is a bunch of civ names for which even he doesnât know how to make them different.
1 Like
Please donât try to explain anything now, you have already given the commitment not to engage with me further. I am dumb.
Donât annoy me⊠I created a thread about this once and if you wanted to move, you would find it.
Besides, itâs hard for you to find something on the Internet, does someone have to lead you by the hand?
Iâm not going to argue with you because I donât need it.
Read one post above you.
1 Like
Anyway very briefly⊠Turingians, Frisians, Bavarians, alemans, Swabians etc were all Germanic people starting to settle in Europe during the migration period.
For example suebi had a kingdom in Galicia along with Visigoths, another branch of them would eventually become Swabia in south Germany.
Frisians substituted Frisii (some think they were the same people) and Romans in modern Netherlands and eventually became Holland.
Turingians were what will be known as lotharingia and they were conquered and reduced to a duchy by Franks. Still there are a lot of turingian leaders in accounts, some say even Odoacer was turingian.
Bavarians were called baiuvarii when they settled near modern Austria in the 5th or 6th century and they had an independent kingdom for some time then becoming a duchy under Charlemagne.
Alemans settled in modern Alsatia, known as alemannia back then, but they also mix with Swabians at one point (I think) to create what is now Switzerland. They were defeated by Franks and fought as a duchy for them but had periods of momentary independence.
1 Like
Unfortunately, this topic has been off topic for a very long time. The discussion is about everything, but not about the BalkansâŠ
2 Likes
As for clothes, architecture etc I donât know enough to say but this just to expose how they all are their own people. Teutons like Italians is a very loose modern concept. One could say the game doesnât need them of course but still they existed, theyâre relatively well documented and have a lot of history. So now you know @Hzdrafxx
1 Like
When are we adding separate civs for
Uzbeks
Kyrgyzs
Tajiks
Dungans
Uighurs
Turkmens
And a hundred more ethnic groups/hordes of people.
When???
If Teutons is a large umbrella civ then Tatars is even larger.
1 Like
I totally agree! You just need AI names, wonder, campaign hero, UU and battles after all to add a civ.
Does anyone here deny Tatars civ split? Because the only one of the three of us who doesnât like split an umbrella is you!
Thatâs what I asked for. Name the different languages, name the dressing differences, name the architecture differences. But you didnât have much to show. Only some nomenclature.
If the sole purpose of this is your knowledge of germania and ego based show off then why even bother. Isnât this Age of Wikipedia?
Yep. And useless Medical Corps UT.
Yes I am denying the split. Itâs idiotic to ask for a Tatarian split. Even more idiotic to ask for a German Split based on City States.
2 Likes
The greatest idiocy is being an idiot.
Regards 
,
Goodbye
Stop this offtopic talking. Stay on topic.
3 Likes