With the upcoming Naions Cup 2023 Team Event I think it would be interesting to see wether the community thinks the individual civs are suited for the different TG positions.
There are certainly civs that are viable in multiple positions, but usually they tend to lean towards one more than the other. I also added the Options of “Diverse” if there are civs that don’t really fit in the established TG positional stereotype and also the option to chose if you think a civ is basically totally useless in TG settings.
Aztecs
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Bengalis
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Berbers
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Bohemians
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Britons
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Bulgarians
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Burgundians
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Burmese
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Byzantines
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Celts
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Chinese
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Cumans
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Dravidians
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Ethioipians
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Franks
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Goths
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Gurjaras
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Hindustanis
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Huns
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Incas
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Italians
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Japanese
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Khmer
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Koreans
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Lithuanians
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Magyars
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Malay
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Malians
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Mayans
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Mongols
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Persians
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Poles
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Portuguese
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Saracens
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Sicilians
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Slavs
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Spanish
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Tatars
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Teutons
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Turks
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Vietnamese
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters
Vikings
- Flank
- Both => Pocket
- Both => Flank
- Diverse
- Useless
0 voters