首先非常感谢你们能推出中国DLC。
但是我要指出，随着游戏的更新，现在在游戏的历史页面中，出现了“魏人”“蜀人”“吴人”的介绍，这是非常不严谨的、非常严重的错误描述！魏蜀吴不是三个民族或文明，它们只是中华文明分裂成三个国家（最后也统一了）如果引起负面舆论很可能在这个敏感时期引发审查导致游戏下架，你们也不想制作DLC的劳动被浪费吧？所以我真诚的建议你们立即取消这个民族或文明的分类，三国不是三个文明或民族，你们完全把他归到编年史里面，就像希腊那样。
我理解你们希望借助三国的大IP让更多的中国玩家购买付费，但是！这个DLC绝对会让事情往相反的方向发展！当务之急是立即修改DLC！多听取中国玩家的建议，我们是真心热爱帝国时代2，它有优秀的历史和传统，他在游戏史上的地位非常重要，我们不希望这个游戏最后变成只考虑挣钱而不考虑历史真实性的垃圾。
10 Likes
This DLC is fantastic! The simplest solution is to simply change the name of “Wei, Shu, Wu” to “Chinese-Wei, Chinese-Shu, Chinese-Wu” in the multiplayer.
1 Like
Cringe AF.
It’s funny people worry about Tibetans being censored. Introducing 3K “ethnicities” like this is strictly worse.
7 Likes
Non-professional translation:
Title: A sincere suggestion from a Chinese player.
First of all, thank you very much for release a Chinese DLC.
But I want to point out, as the game being updated, the history section in the game, the introduction of “Wei”, “Shu”, and “Wu” appears. This is a very unrigorous and seriously wrong description! Wei, Shu, Wu is not three ethnic groups nor civilizations, but a three nations that spilt from the Chinese civilization (and reunited eventually).
In such sensitive time period like now (Notes: I guess OP means the US-China relationship), public backlash might cause the game to be censored and prohibited, you wouldn’t want your effort on this DLC to be wasted? So I sincerely to suggest you to cancel the classification of those ethnic groups or civilizations, three kingdoms is not three ethnic group or three civilizations. You people totally could move them into Chronicles, like Battle for Greece.
I understand you want to borrow the three kingdom’s popularity so more Chinese player would pay, but! This DLC will definitely lead to the opposite direction! It’s urgent to change this DLC immediately! Please listen to voice of Chinese players, we truly loves AoE2, it has an outstanding history and tradition, and holds such an important role in gaming history, we do not wish this game after all, become a trash that only considers making money instead of historical authenticity.
8 Likes
游戏里推出西藏文明/民族其实并不会被审查，相反还会很认同，因为这个游戏的背景就是在古代、中世纪，我们的历史教科书也照样会说古代西藏如何与唐王朝和亲、战争……就像蒙古一样，既然游戏里已经有了古代蒙古，为什么不能有古代西藏？甚至鲜卑、党项、南诏、回鹘统统可以，他们是真实存在的。
而三国问题就不一样了，魏蜀吴绝对不是三个民族或文明，在我们中国玩家看来，这样的设计才是分裂我们的国家、歪曲我们的历史，是很严重的错误，也是很低级的错误。
2 Likes
我觉得并不是审查的问题，而是制作组自我陶醉的问题，他自己做了一个觉得会让所有人大喜过望的东西，根本没在意过别人是怎么想的，甚至他只要看一下这个论坛就会知道玩家想要什么，但他根本没看过，这里闹了这么多天，他们也像没看见一样，问的问题也从不回答…
4 Likes
现在很多人觉得是先做两宋然后转头做三国，我反而觉得是先做三国然后加上两个纯属添头的文明“充实内容”。会这么选择的理由也很简单：首先制作组自以为三国题材最受欢迎，其次制作组要省钱（主要是语音录制，如今契丹和女真复用了蒙语和普通话很明显了）。但帝国2对三国的表现力实属有限，我要玩三国为什么不去其他游戏？后者……没钱了不如啥也不做，或者只给老文明补战役
Many people in Chinese community think they meant to make 10th century content first and then turn to 3k. However, I think it’s decided to make 3k at the very beginning and then add the two civilizations that are purely additions to fill out the content. The reasons for this choice are simple: firstly, devs thought that the Three Kingdoms theme was the most popular, and secondly, devs wanted to save money (mainly on voice recording, which is obvious now that the Khitan and the Jurchen units use Mongolian and Mandarin Chinese). But aoe2 is very limited in present 3k period, if I love 3k, why not go to other games? The latter … running out of money might as well do nothing, or just make campaigns for old civs
1 Like
LoL thank you for that comment. Made me laugh heartily.
wow U R genius. Although this seems to be AOE-4-style “variations”, it makes me feel better