# What should Age of Empires IV improve?

**URL:** <https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172>\
**Category:** IV - Discussion\
**Created:** [June 13, 2023, 2:56pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172 "2023-06-13T14:56:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 54

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WoTaiNanLeYa](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/wotainanleya/32/29773_2.png) [@WoTaiNanLeYa](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/WoTaiNanLeYa)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2025, 8:53pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172/1116 "2025-12-15T20:53:53Z")

</div>

**Docks should be set to be buildable only in Age II.** In Age I, each civilization has its own distinct development path and significant differences in economic potential. While some civilizations are capable of generating substantial economic advantages during this period, the availability of Docks disrupts these unique progressions.

The reason this design worked in _Age of Empires II_ is that all civilizations in that game were essentially identical in Age I.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TheLiberator236](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/theliberator236/32/179247_2.png) [@TheLiberator236](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/TheLiberator236)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2025, 10:33pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172/1117 "2025-12-15T22:33:14Z")

</div>

> [@WoTaiNanLeYa](#):
>
> The reason this design worked in _Age of Empires II_ is that all civilizations in that game were essentially identical in Age I.

But this is AoE IV, not I or II

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lestation](https://forums.ageofempires.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/d26b3c/32.png) [@lestation](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/lestation)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2025, 1:27pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172/1118 "2025-12-23T13:27:19Z")

</div>

- Extra game settings like treaty, penalty and population limit
- Save mode in non ranked multiplayer
- More full stand-alone civs

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HasanIchess](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/hasanichess/32/103811_2.png) [@HasanIchess](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/HasanIchess)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2025, 2:23am UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172/1119 "2025-12-29T02:23:03Z")

</div>

Please fill out the following survey

> [@Devs please put Empire Wars mode as an optional mode in quick match](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/devs-please-put-empire-wars-mode-as-an-optional-mode-in-quick-match/230540/3):
>
> Empire Wars only has 150 players at the Conqueror level; high-level players don’t play Empire Wars frequently. Personally, I have no problem with lower-level players finding the game easier with the auto-queue of villagers (I understood that it was the highly competitive players who opposed this change). Please fill out the following survey [poll](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/devs-please-put-empire-wars-mode-as-an-optional-mode-in-quick-match/230540/3)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MadMax8915](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/madmax8915/32/158089_2.png) [@MadMax8915](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/MadMax8915)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2026, 11:40pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172/1120 "2026-01-08T23:40:25Z")

</div>

## To immortalize this request, I’ll post it here as well!

### Request for a major rework of the Campaigns!

It concerns the campaigns.

For most casual players, the campaigns might be fun, but the problem is replayability. Usually you play once and finish, and it takes a long time to replay, and sometimes you don’t even replay.

For a casual player, playing every day will be much better and more fun playing the “skirmish” mode and and private matches than playing the campaign every day. The reason is simple… the campaign is very predictable and always follows the same script and cannot be played in co-op. So

I suggest a complete overhaul/rework of the campaigns at some point in the future.

Because with the ideas I’m going to describe here, the campaign maps will need a rework; in short, you need LARGER maps to unlock the maximum potential.

### The campaigns should be like this:

1. A) Have Co-op Support (playing with friends!!! Let’s face it, is the basic thing anyone likes to do. Campaigns can be played single-player, but they can also be played with one invited friend or even put an AI ally in place of the friend).
2. B) Several “modifier” options should be included, which the player creating the campaign room will configure for their “world”. This will completely change the experience and replayability of the campaign.

**What is a “modifier”?**  
—\> These are options that are always disabled by default, but you can activate them, and this will completely change the campaign experience, potentially making battles easier or harder, or more unpredictable, with behavioral changes.

### Examples of some modifier:

1. 
  - **Spawn enemy generals or high-ranking officers,** who will patrol the map with a small army and hunt you down. (Basically, it’s a mini-boss with a private army that accompanies him). Remember that the general or high-ranking officer may retreat and lead his army to small towns to heal and rehire reinforcements, or they may retreat to large capital cities where they can heal and rehire large numbers of reinforcements.

2. 
  - **Spawn of One feudal lord or “ruling lord” in each small town** on the map. They will be responsible for providing administrative and economic bonuses to the town, making it richer, more prosperous, with a decent army and better fortified. In short, if you take too long to attack these towns, they will become increasingly well-defended and prepared. Importantly, if you were to locate and kill the “feudal lord or ruling lord,” that town would stop evolving and would become a town that only produces the basics to sustain itself.

3. 
  - **Spawn of neutral enemy factions.** These are basically “bandits” or “mercenaries” or “Vikings” or “some common enemy from the campaign’s story that will now appear on all campaign maps to cause chaos!”. Basically, this new enemy will hinder the player, but will also attack the standard enemy of the campaign. In short, this modifier can serve as a kind of “neutral ally,” since it will also attack enemy cities and generals to loot them. Generally, their attack consists of ambushes, disrupting trade, and attacking villages with low defenses, or pursuing and looting weakened armies.

4. 
  - **Spawn more treasure chests**. Basically, it’s designed to make your life easier; it will generate more chests on the map.

5. 
  - **Spawn more prisoners** on the map. Every time you free them, they will be integrated into your army. You can usually find them in larger numbers inside enemy cities and camps.

6. 
  - **Spawn of wild animals in your Apex version!** These animals will be 5 times stronger than a normal animal and 15% larger, in addition to having a different color. These animals have a disease: the rabies! They will attack any enemy that approaches, including enemies on the map. Every Apex has a self-healing buff, which will slowly heal your life over time. If the Apex manages to kill a certain number of enemies, they can “call” a new Apex partner to assist them in the hunts. In some cases, this can form a small pack or group.

7. 
  - **Spawn of 1 or 2 new enemy cities.** depending on the campaign map. If you combine it with the modifier named _“Spawn of One feudal lord or ruling lord”_, you can make these small cities evolve into larger and better-fortified cities over time (remember not to take too long to attack them, unless you want a greater challenge).

8. 
  - **Spawn of 1 small allied city.** Basically, you can trade and interact with this city. It may give you rewards, such as small troops or treasures, as long as you complete the side quests it asks of you.

9. 
  - **Spawns 1 legendary monster or creature.** These beings grant a large amount of treasure or an exclusive upgrade for your base. The monsters will attack any enemy that approaches, not just the player. Well, these monsters were already added to the game in some previous Age of Empires IV event, now these monster models will be reused for this Campaign modifier. You will always spawn 1 different monster on each campaign map, which will give you a special reward upon defeating it.

Honestly, they would need a team just to take care of the campaigns and start preparing to rework the previous campaigns.

Would be amazing if it were done.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MadMax8915](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/madmax8915/32/158089_2.png) [@MadMax8915](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/MadMax8915)\
**Post date:** [January 8, 2026, 11:48pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172/1121 "2026-01-08T23:48:02Z")

</div>

# To immortalize these 3 great requests! I’ll post them here too.

* * *

New animals need to be added to replace the wolf, the wild boar, the deer and the sheeps on the maps. All according to their biome.

In the examples below, I have included variant species; these variants can be added later or not to save time, choosing only one common standard species.

## New animal suggestions (according to the biome):

### **—New replacements for wolves (with their respective variations):**

- Bears (species: black bear, brown bear, and polar bear)
- Lion
- Tiger
- Jaguar (other optional animals: jaguar, panther, puma and snow leopard)
- Crocodile (other optional animals: crocodile, alligator, and Komodo dragon).

### **—New replacements for wild boars:**

- Moose
- Rhinos (possible species: white rhinoceros, black rhinoceros, and Indian rhinoceros)
- Buffalo (possible species: Mediterranean, Asian, and Indonesian)
- Bison
- Elephants (possible species: African elephant, Indian elephant and Forest elephant)

### **—New replacements for deer:**

- Zebra (other optional animals: Giraffes and Wildebeest)
- Turkeys
- Ostrich (possible species: Ostrich and Ema)
- Capybara
- Camels

### **—New replacements for sheep:**

- Llama or Alpacas
- Goose
- Goat
- Chickens

* * *

## The game needs more color variations in the civilization selection.

Colors are extremely important for overall enjoyment and for casual players.

Colors function like SKINS!

Through colors, we can “change” the appearance of units, always providing a new and pleasant feeling.

Some colors can even convey a sense of grandeur if combined with the civilization’s standard colors.

### Include new colors in the civilization selection:

- Gray
- Brown
- Black
- White
- Light Green (suggestions: Lime Green or Mint Green)
- Dark Green (suggestions: Moss Green or Petrol Green)

\ ***Regarding the color Green present in the game:** The default green color will be removed, and in its place, the two colors Light Green and Dark Green will be introduced.

\ ***Note:** It is recommended to use a very neutral color tone for the minimap to facilitate visibility. Generally, light beige or medium beige works very well for the minimap background, making all colors more visible.

* * *

## AI personality selection.

Include personality selection for AIs (something similar exists in AoM:R).

### Possible suggestions for new AI selection behaviors (I really need this):

1. 
  - Defensive AI (Can build walls, and attacks and defends only sacred points and can build the wonder).

2. 
  - Turtle AI (Looks very similar to the Defensive AI, because it also builds walls, but it can attack enemy bases, but it takes a long time to attack, focusing first on strengthening itself considerably).

3. 
  - Guerrilla AI (Attacks quickly and focuses mainly on cheap and light units. Uses accumulated gold to rapidly upgrade units and create powerful siege units).

4. 
  - Tactical AI (AI specialized in dividing armies into 3 or even 5 parts and using them to attack the same target. Its main objective is to surround the enemy’s rear and also flank enemy siege units. A good part of its army will need to be quite mobile, making constant use of cavalry units).

5. 
  - Rusher AI (Attacks quickly, but likes to launch waves of systemic attacks. Produces varied units, focusing on units that cost gold and being supported by light units. Generally opts for cheaper siege units, such as ballistas, battering rams, and trebuchets, as it will heavily invest gold in powerful special units, exemple: infantry, cavalry, and units long-range).

6. 
  - Conqueror AI (Uses the most efficient means to evolve and have the most powerful army to destroy the enemy with a large army). It focuses on attacking using a very large army.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![\[KLEKS\]PoLaK](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/[kleks]polak/32/203692_2.png) [@\[KLEKS\]PoLaK](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/[KLEKS]PoLaK)\
**Post date:** [January 13, 2026, 7:04pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172/1122 "2026-01-13T19:04:47Z")

</div>

Cheaters should be gone from this game! Reported lads 3-4 weeks ago and they are still in game, and today our other friends got the same thoughts on the same lads where we were playing 4v4, and he got 1v1 with same fella!

Reported to Teams and what i’v got bounced back ?  
I was soo offensive in TOPIC and topic was close ! Funny !

So we can handshake with Cheaters in this game ? and clap them? even if we will report these lads all the time?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bruno79955](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/bruno79955/32/183634_2.png) [@Bruno79955](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/Bruno79955)\
**Post date:** [January 16, 2026, 10:05am UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172/1123 "2026-01-16T10:05:39Z")

</div>

[Matchmaking](https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/1439603200880541696/1461511415629086914/image.png?ex=696ad213&is=69698093&hm=e4f7261e5b6e548d1f9df080d8aefcfe23912b03d3a566d544a8dd9e1ca97aaf&=&format=webp&quality=lossless)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chickoo1990](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/chickoo1990/32/166060_2.png) [@Chickoo1990](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/Chickoo1990)\
**Post date:** [January 29, 2026, 9:36am UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172/1124 "2026-01-29T09:36:29Z")

</div>

The Controller Control should be urgent more optimized. (see my other Posts - Quickmenu)

> [@Quickmenu (Controller) need to be optimized](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/quickmenu-controller-need-to-be-optimized/282246):
>
> the Controller Player Quickmenu (for the army production) need to be adjust. If the max amount has been reached, units are missing. Solution: All the Upgrades should be at the other layer (Page) and maybe could add an second page, it would be helpfull. its Important to see all the available units. Otherwise its kind of useless and you need to search the right building to produce the missing units (in this example Cheirosiphon or other siege units)

–\> It is essential for all console players.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GhostShamalow](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/ghostshamalow/32/205396_2.png) [@GhostShamalow](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/GhostShamalow)\
**Post date:** [January 29, 2026, 2:10pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172/1125 "2026-01-29T14:10:20Z")

</div>

> [@Idée Suggestions pour améliorer le Game Play de Age of empires IV](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/idee-suggestions-pour-ameliorer-le-game-play-de-age-of-empires-iv/283701):
>
> bonjour dans le game play de age of empires IV pourraiton donner une barre d endurance au unite pour que cela soi plus realiste exemple les chevalier francais pourrais s epuiser au bous d un certain temps voir meme pouvoir les faire tomber de cheval pour qu il finissent le combat a pieds cela serait il possible. Hello, in the gameplay of Age of Empires IV, could we have an endurance bar for units to make it more realistic? For example, French knights could get exhausted after a certain time, or…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BeALy69](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/bealy69/32/97982_2.png) [@BeALy69](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/BeALy69)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2026, 9:22am UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172/1126 "2026-02-01T09:22:42Z")

</div>

Yes please! I would love if the game remembered my last skirmish set up so I wouldn’t have to set it up every time I play a game.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BeALy69](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/bealy69/32/97982_2.png) [@BeALy69](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/BeALy69)\
**Post date:** [February 1, 2026, 9:55am UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172/1127 "2026-02-01T09:55:49Z")

</div>

DEVS PLEASE PAY ATTENTION TO AI IMPROVEMENTS:

AI needs to STOP building so many military boats on water that has no enemies.

- Even tiny ponds. This is evident in random maps as well as other maps. I would rather they don’t even build a dock than have all their pop slot filled with boats that they can’t do anything with and a tiny land army that I easily decimate.

AI needs to be able to BUILD on STEALTH FORESTS. Some random maps with are mostly stealth forests…so if playing NOMAD the AI can’t even build a proper base. This has such bad affect especially on cigs including Ayyubids and abbasid where they build their LANDMARKS on the other side of the map away from their main TC.

Random Maps seem to not be so random anymore. I don’t know about anyone else? I only get stealth forest maps, a couple of rivers maps, islands?!? It used to be a lot more random and mixed up.

I also do miss the turtle random maps where there would be big mountains dividing up a lot of the map so you could find a secret spot to start your base.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BeALy69](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/bealy69/32/97982_2.png) [@BeALy69](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/BeALy69)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2026, 4:48pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172/1128 "2026-02-02T16:48:10Z")

</div>

AI loves tiny ponds

 ![IMG_1617](https://forums.ageofempires.com/uploads/default/original/3X/0/3/030d2c5ac04bb4a7ea4aaf93109a30ffb453a836.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MatM1996](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/matm1996/32/29566_2.png) [@MatM1996](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/MatM1996)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2026, 8:33pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172/1129 "2026-02-03T20:33:39Z")

</div>

Yes, I agree with this very strongly…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PCM4st3r](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/pcm4st3r/32/60398_2.png) [@PCM4st3r](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/PCM4st3r)\
**Post date:** [February 14, 2026, 4:53pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172/1130 "2026-02-14T16:53:59Z")

</div>

I’m doing a lot of PVE matchmaking these days and it’s sad that the opponents are only called “IA 1 easy”, “IA 2 hard”, etc… in AOE they had a random name more or less themed to the civilization being played.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HasanIchess](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/hasanichess/32/103811_2.png) [@HasanIchess](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/HasanIchess)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2026, 4:48pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172/1131 "2026-02-15T16:48:09Z")

</div>

My proposal is to give heavy cavalry a population of 1.5.

> [@Correcting the siege resulted in a cavalry "meta."](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/correcting-the-siege-resulted-in-a-cavalry-meta/284073):
>
> [VortiX February 2026 Tier List](https://www.reddit.com/r/aoe4/comments/1r5crjx/vortix_february_2026_tier_list/) My proposal is to give heavy cavalry a population of 1.5. Decimals aren’t a problem for the game since it truncates them and represents them as a whole number. For example, 1 knight will show that it occupies one population, but 2 knights will show that it occupies three population. As proof that the game truncates, when an Imperial officer oversees the stable, it accelerates heavy cavalry production from 35 to 9 because it trunc…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TheLiberator236](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/theliberator236/32/179247_2.png) [@TheLiberator236](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/TheLiberator236)\
**Post date:** [February 18, 2026, 8:50pm UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172/1132 "2026-02-18T20:50:22Z")

</div>

Yep this is a very nice suggestion actually

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HasanIchess](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/hasanichess/32/103811_2.png) [@HasanIchess](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/HasanIchess)\
**Post date:** [February 25, 2026, 4:54am UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172/1133 "2026-02-25T04:54:20Z")

</div>

> [@HasanIchess](#):
>
> > [@HasanIchess](#):
> >
> > Anything that simulates a 2Tc should not be cheap like the cost of the dock. I think I should make a thread dedicated to that topic.
> 
> Standardize the cost of docks with 250 wood or more (and higher HP like the Templars).
> 
> ![imagen](https://forums.ageofempires.com/uploads/default/original/3X/0/8/08c1dc0c9b4fb74b2e7e85cf09d2b2fe82f887d9.jpeg) ![imagen](https://forums.ageofempires.com/uploads/default/original/3X/1/f/1fe6059e9f971d147e9a93c033397e1b216cee54.jpeg)
> 
> The game launched with poor water mechanics, which you fixed a while ago. Deep-sea fish are also incentive enough to not ignore the fight for water.
> 
> Therefore, **cheap docks are no longer a _necessary_ incentive to fight for water.** Balance water management because it only benefits some aggressive civilizations in the Dark Ages.
> 
> ![imagen](https://forums.ageofempires.com/uploads/default/original/3X/5/4/54f8a02b4e771608ff46d879f39f4ddb0d94ea7e.png)
> 
> [https://aoe4world.com/stats/rm\_solo/maps/Ocean%20Gateway?patch=6970%2C7064%2C7149](https://aoe4world.com/stats/rm_solo/maps/Ocean%20Gateway?patch=6970%252C7064%252C7149)
> 
> ![imagen](https://forums.ageofempires.com/uploads/default/original/3X/1/a/1af376fbad8735a000a614cd9ff15af0e57471db.png)

> [@Do You like to play water maps ? Or do You like naval combat in AoE4?](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/do-you-like-to-play-water-maps-or-do-you-like-naval-combat-in-aoe4/244030/21):
>
> The dock is too cheap, I’m not asking for it to cost 750 resources with a cost of 250 wood and the water collection fee, that’s enough incentive to fight for water.

The rate of shore fishing barely improved. **increase the cost of the docks.**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mikhail1001](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/mikhail1001/32/86989_2.png) [@Mikhail1001](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/Mikhail1001)\
**Post date:** [February 27, 2026, 5:41am UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172/1134 "2026-02-27T05:41:42Z")

</div>

the 3 main things that need improving right now

Developers communication with the community, especially whenever criticisms over the game are brought up. A lot of people have been getting tired of the usual response of “we’re working on it” especially given the track record of taking months to patch exploits which brings up the next thing needing work on.

A more hardline approach against exploiters and cheaters like the recently talked about one with the Golden Horde spawning 100 keshiks by the 21 minute mark by disassembling and reassembling the Building Carts doubling on to the amount of units spawned each time and at the cost of 2, and Map Hackers being the other worst of the worst when it comes to cheaters cause I mean how would you like it if someone could see what you’ve made and made the counter while you can’t? it’s not at all fair and any caught doing that need to face bans and repeated offenders need to be IP BANNED, not account banned IP BANNED.

Cavalry also needs to be nerfed or Infantry needs to be buffed, cause even on closed maps Heavy Cavalry dominate the meta and the games have been getting stale and boring cause of it. A good suggestion I have that may be a bit controversial to some would be to make it so Cavalry can’t dismantle castles or towers to force cavalry main civs to add variety to their army like Infantry or siege and help bring balance to the Meta.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HasanIchess](https://forums.ageofempires.com/user_avatar/forums.ageofempires.com/hasanichess/32/103811_2.png) [@HasanIchess](https://forums.ageofempires.com/u/HasanIchess)\
**Post date:** [March 5, 2026, 10:21am UTC](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172/1135 "2026-03-05T10:21:25Z")

</div>

two years since publication, without taking it into account

> [@Request: Highlight resources in caster mode](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/request-highlight-resources-in-caster-mode/235428/4):
>
> A colored line below the highest resource per minute is a subtle and clean way to evaluate the game. I also think it’s better if you can see the number of villagers at the same time. Please implement it.

 ![imagen](https://forums.ageofempires.com/uploads/default/original/3X/d/8/d893b4618b779d5c69a3e4c90dd71b3ff0970642.jpeg)

[Previous page](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172.md?page=53)

[Next page](https://forums.ageofempires.com/t/what-should-age-of-empires-iv-improve/233172.md?page=55)
