Hehe, I hear ya. In fact, I tried the same thing back in May of last year Is funny our thread titles are so similar:
After seeing replies there, though, I came to the conclusion that balance changes to āstir the pot upā, so to speak, are kindāve cool. It would be pretty unfortunate if civs were forever locked in stone with one particular civ being the dominant civ for all eternity in the game, and so everyone always plays it. Isnāt it nice that power can change, and/or you have to devise new strategies due to balance changes?
Prior to that thread, I always thought balance changes were simply to try and create the perfect state where all civs are perfectly equal in power. So, I also wondered how/why it wasnāt perfectly balanced yet after so many years, or why it was such a big deal.