Just simply a question for which there will be various opinions. Cheers.
I have a ton of candidates, but I think if I had to pick the first ones in my order of priority it would be the Thais, the Jurchens, some South Asian civs, some African civs or the Georgians and Armenians. I would like to see a few more Europeans, but I feel like we need to spend sometimes around the rest of the world before we come back to this old continent. As for the Americas, we probably need a bit more of them but there’s no one I specifically wish for.
Looking at both holes in the map and important civs I would say Tamils, Swahili/Zimbabwe, Jurchens, a Caucasus civ, and some representative for Afghans
I would like to see either of these pairs:
Armenians & Georgians
Serbs & Croats
Romanians/Vlachs & Rus to rename Slavs
If the DLC will be outside Europe, then either sub Saharan Africa or Indian subcontinent.
I think a Thai/Lao DLC pairing would fit RotR civs too.
Tibet Dravidians Bengals Nubians Swiss and Venice.
Bonnes factions : Tamouls, Chola, Rajput (comme on m’a recommandé), Venise, Serbes, Géorgiens, Croates. Je n’ai aucune idée des factions africaines.
La mise à jour indique qu’ils prévoient «très très longtemps». Je suis intrigué par ce que cela signifiera en termes de nouveau contenu. Pourraient-ils ajouter des trucs révolutionnaires?
I think even if some people might be disappointed with what will come in this next DLC, it surely won’t be the last one.
With new architecture or … 6+5 ?
At least with unique castles.
That will make it even more biased, no?
What do you mean by biased?
Only one architecture set having a ton of extra buildings, like Krepost, 3 Folwarks models, 3 unique castles and so on and you want to add more to it while others stare desperately.
But those 5 civs are probably too small to have their own architecture set.
Mississippians, Haudenosaunee, Hitsatsonim (Pueblo/Anasazi), Tongans, Kongolese, Zimbabweans, Muisca, Kanembu, Swahili, Mapuche, Chola, Bengals, Jurchen, Siamese…
These civs I’d love to see any of:
South America: Chimu, Wari, Mapuche, Muisca
Mesoamerica: Tarascans (Purepechas), Zapotecs, Tlaxcaltecs
North America: Mississippians, Haudenosaunee, Puebloans (low priority imo)
West Africa: Kanembu, Benin (Edo), Yoruba, Songhai, Ghanaians, Hausa
East Africa: Nubians, Somalis
Southern Africa: Kongolese, Zimbabweans (Shona), Swahili
South Asia: Tamils, Bengalis, Kannads, Odias, Sinhalese
East Asia: Jurchen, Tibetans, Khitans, Tanguts (Western Xia), Bais (Nanzhao+Dali)
South-East Asia: Tais, Chams, Javanese
Caucasus: Georgians, Khazars, Armenians, Alans/Vandals
Europe: Vlachs, Swiss, Serbs, Croats
That’s 42 candidates for new civs, for a total of 81! So there’s clearly lots of possibilities for new DLCs/expansions, it’s all about being creative with civ design, in a good way.
I’d also like to see Indians and Slavs renamed to somethings more appropriate. Celts could also be renamed Gaels because the current name is a bit illogical as the Britons are also a Celtic people. If we had Gaels + Britons I think it would nicely represent the Scots/Irish and Welsh/English respectively.
for me more civs and campaings = better
America: Mapuche, Mississippians, Iroquis, Zapotecs
Africa: Shona, Kongolese, Nubians, Kanembu
Asia: Tamils, Bengalis, Tibetans, Javanese, Uyghurs
Europe: Swiss, Croats, Romanians, Dutch, Armenians, Georgians
Slavs need to be renamed to Rus
Central Europeans architecture to Bohemians
If more Indian factions gets added it should come with a new skin for the king and new set of sails for ships.
And the Ingame Interface Panel specific to each architecture set that’s missing.
One faction that I would love to see, and it’s hardly mentioned, are the Tunisians, just because the campaign potential with Abu 'Amr 'Uthman is too great.
Breaking the Berber umbrella sounds like a can of worm, especially if we base them on modern states.