it will never mean practically all bugs have been found, that wont be the case ever 
believe me, QA may work well, but user inputs can be VERY hard to emulate sometimes^^
1 Like
I didn’t say it will have no bugs. I said I wouldn’t be surprised if it has not bugs.
PS: I am programmer. I am the last person I would say that there can’t be bugs in a program. Lets say never say never. 
1 Like
how can you be a programmer and not be surprised if a game has no bugs on release?
I mean then you certainly know how bugs are 
And you also know how samecode on different hardware can alsocause massive issues, whicch is probably one of the reasons a closed beta is needed^^
I cant wait to get work into my freetime and catch all the nasty bugs age 4 beta will offer. And I WILL find them 
But the later the beta is, the less impactful it will be. even for civ balance they will need some time.
2 Likes
Even the most perfect program might have bugs. Even a script that can be optimized might count as bug. For example the enemy of something ‘good’ is something ‘better’. Even a good pathfinding, it can almost always become even better.
I was speaking about bugs a user can detect that leads to an event that is not ‘acceptable’ at the release of an AAA game lets say.
I) know, an I was talking about the same. As a QA Worker I can assure you not all bugs will be found because some users do stuff noone would ever test
1 Like