Asian Heroes and Healers Rework

They wouldn’t be scary if their abilities were still tied to wonders. Golden Pavilion could provide them with auras, the Shogunate could regulate their unit training, and Torii Gate could allow them to receive shipments. Once you lose your wonders they would be considerably neutered. I also think timed respawning like the Africans would help stop them from being spammed.

The “reincarnation” tech you propose is kinda problematic. Its just like turning tigers into disciples.

We should stay away from mythological and supernatural elements as much as possible, since these further promote stereotypes about these cultures.

Being able to convert animal treasure guardians, dancing around a firepit for bonuses etc were all reworked to make these mechanics more realistic and not based on supernatural elements. So we shouldn’t bring it back.


I don’t think it’s on the same level as Kung Fu bear punching conversions. It would just be a more thematically appropriate way to give them tigers.

Things like the dancing were changed because the Sun Dance is a sacred thing not really for outsiders, not because it’s supernatural.

If supernatural abilities were off the table AoE4 wouldn’t have mega conversions like they do.

not a bad idea, lol.

Conversion isnt really supernatural. Religious mass conversions have happened in history.

If you go back to the reasons why firepit was replaced by community plaza on the aoe website, its because they didn’t want to promote any shamanic mysticism for native civs.

Anyway, reincarnation is not a scientific occurrence… and we should just stick to things that can actually happen instead of promoting any non-science based beliefs.

The real problem is that religious people should not be military leaders and town leaders. They shouldn’t be heroes.

Why change drastically? Maybe we should apply the same mechanics to something as possible.

No. This is the own characteristic of African heroes.

Wonders should not be tightly bound to the hero. In most occasions, Wonders should only provide abilities or resources, as they do now.
Not to mention that Wonders themselves are the products of stereotypes, and if you want to change heroes for cultural significance, you have to totally change the wonder mechanics too.

He’s fit to be a hero, but shouldn’t have been there at the beginning of the game.
He should still be the reward that can be obtained after choosing the Shogunate.

Bad design. Once dead, the Japanese early economy would immediately slump.
It is not necessary to insist that shrines have to be built by Shinto stuffs, they can be built by non-religious people too.

In my design, I would like to replace Sohei Archer with Cartographers.
Cartographers are based on the samurai explorers like Mogami Tokunai (最上徳内), Mamiya Rinzō (間宮林蔵) and Inō Tadataka (伊能忠敬) who had explored the north lands like modern Hokkaido and Sakhalin. They will be very much in line with the theme the hero uses to scout.

Cartographers are weak samurai heroes and explorers who use bows or muskets and can also build shrines. There are 2 when the game started, just like original Sohei Archer. I believe they will continue the Japanese gameplay in this way.

Also, Japanese healers can be replaced by Monks. They are just normal healer units like European Priests, trainable at Monastery with lower HP and cheaper cost. No fancy design is needed here.

Most appropriate? I’m afraid you don’t understand Chinese culture.
Iron-cap Princes are hereditary nobles of the feudal system, but they do not necessarily have military power or know how to fight.

In my opinion, we can introduce Armed Caravan Leader and Armed Caravan Member to continue as a Master-Disciple-like relationship.

The Leader is equivalent melee hero to Shaolin Master but not such strong. He is unable to convert treasure guardians into Disciple or Armed Caravan Member, however he can unpack the crates to gather resources, and trickles coin or export thinly while moving. The Member is not hero, the equivalent hand shock infantry to Disciple, and can be trained by Armed Caravan Leader.

In the Qing Dynasty, the caravan like Mabang (馬幫) was an important economic artery of the empire. Merchants organized into guilds, did business back and forth across the vast territory, and even traded with European and Southeast Asian countries along the Siberian Route and the Ancient Tea Horse Road. The trade route was quite dangerous, so the caravan had to be armed, and even hired private guards from escort bureau.

We can reuse the modules of original Master and Disciple to make Chinese healers at Monastery and name them Abbot and Disciple respectively. They will not be heroes, but will have the decent combat ability for emergency use.

The design will foster stereotypes.
We can just introduce Monks as ordinary healer like Japanese I stated above but with Indian looks instead of Japanese looks. Then, reuse the module of original Brahmin to introduce a kind of elite healer.

My designs for Asian rework. Welcome to check.

1 Like

Regardless of a reincarnation, Gurus would be a much more appropriate unit than Brahmins. It would just make them a much more interesting unit.

There are plenty of religious references in the games. Shintos can’t hunt and there’s a building for worshipping cows. If you want to square it with reality just think of it as a cultural thing. When a Guru dies the community selects a successor that they believe is their reincarnation.

Reviving and ransoming is a characteristic of the Europeans and Natives, it’s not like it’s a unique Asian thing being lost. The theme and mechanics of African heroes fits very well for Asian civs. Having leaders that are nobles and princes like the Ras and Emir is a lot more appropriate than monks. The stun ability would still set them apart as unique Asian heroes.

Ideally no, but it would probably be required to balance the stronger abilities of things like a permanent Daimyo. The wonders are already tied to the pseudo-hero Mansabdar and Daimyo units and this would just be simplifying that. I’d be all for more utilitarian landmarks instead of mystical wonders.

Villagers would obviously still be able to build them. Kannushi would just be an extra unit to help explore and make up for the hero not being able to construct Shrines anymore.

Yes, that’s the idea (a different name for it would also be fine) and many of them knew how to fight. It would be equivalent to the ranks of minor nobility like a Daimyo, Ras or Emir. “Cartographer” and “Armed Caravan Leader” are unnecessarily wordy and essentially means Explorer so they should just be called that. That’s a valid approach to take for a rework but it’s following the European template instead of the African template as I’m suggesting.

The only reason for the “Master” unit is that he’s the explorer, just one Warrior Monk is really needed.

Basically everything in the game is a stereotype so I don’t think that’s a major problem. Guru would still be a better name even if it didn’t have any stereotypical abilities. The European healers are bland and hardly used. They should get a rework themselves and shouldn’t be the baseline for a rework into generic Asian Monks. Some unique attributes like building Shrines or maybe even being able to help construct Wonders would make them useful beyond just healing. Giving a starting healer would also make up for having only one hero at the game’s start.

1 Like

Guru means elder. They were teachers, not always spiritual. School teachers were also called guru when my grandparents were kids. The choice of a different guru is typically not based on ideas of rebirth, at least where I come from in India. A disciple of the guru replaces the guru as the new elder.

There is a difference between choosing a different guru who you “think” is a reincarnation, and actually replacing them with a tiger (rebirth is something hindu philosophy believes in, but the person is reborn as a random life form somewhere in the wild, not necessarily a pet).

Religious beliefs that are practiced can be in the game, like shintoism, not eating meat etc. But I believe having mechanics that are not scientifically grounded isn’t great.

By non-scientific, i mean things like transforming into a bird etc. Not eating meat is still scientifically possible, as in, you can physically not eat meat, but its physically impossible to turn into a tiger.

The point of an Asian rework is essentially to get rid of stereotypes…

Gameplay changes arent really needed.


It doesn’t matter if it physically happens, just that people believe it. If a holy man dies and a his followers comes across a tiger that they believe to be his reincarnation they may revere it. Not necessarily how this commonly works, but it’s in the realm of possibility.

I’m just trying to rework some of the existing mechanics like Tiger training into a new form in order to preserve them. Various Gurus and ideas about reincarnation are present across India so all I’m saying is it is thematically plausible.

Gurus should have some kind of special ability to prevent them from being another bland, mostly useless healer. Maybe instead of “reincarnation” it could follow the Sikh tradition and allow a new Guru to spawn each time one is killed up to 9 times.

The game would be nothing if you got rid of all the stereotypes (Granted some are a lot more negative than others). They also have a tendency to be excessively extreme with these kinds of changes. Renaming Medicine Men to “Healers” reduces clarity and is totally unnecessary since it was always an accurate and inoffensive term.

There are also good reasons for gameplay changes. Japan is very gimmicky and arguably overpowered so a change to Daimyos could help.

No. No no no no no no no.

Not sure this is a good idea. Indians are protraied as hindu, I don’t think going the Emir way is the right proposition.

Emirs should be saved as heroes for middle eastern DLC.


Anything in particular you don’t like about Daimyos? They’re the obvious choice for a Japanese hero but maybe there’s a better way to do it.

Emir is pretty much a perfect fit for India. The civ is based off the Mughals and Emir is generic enough to cover most leadership roles. Under the Mughals, a mostly Muslim elite ruled over a majority non-Muslim empire. A leader who is an Emir (likely Muslim but not necessarily) in conjunction with Hindu elements like Sacred Cows and Gurus represents this perfectly.

They may be the obvious choice, but I don’t think it is the right approach. The current monks are a better fit because:

  1. They mostly useless after shrining is done, and this is a good thing. Their monastery upgrades grants them some late game usability, and that is fine.
  2. Daimyos that get resurrected like heroes will be a huge PITA to deal with, probably worse than they already are.
  3. Your design ties too many bonuses to the daimyos, this makes it a binary unit, you either kill it fast or you get steamrolled. If you attempt is to make Japan less annoying, you are not doing it right.

Respawn is indeed the most obvious feature of African heroes, regardless of whether they are nobles or not. Let Asian heroes maintain the ransom mechanism. This is absolutely nothing that needs to be changed. You are starting to go overboard.

Asian heroes don’t need to be nobles at all as long as they fit the current mechanics and are not stereotyped. Isn’t it also a stereotype of you to insist to have to be nobles or princes?

Even if Daimyo becomes a hero, it can still be knocked down and lose its effect until the player is willing to pay the ransom.

It’s you who changed it into a respawn mechanism, so there might be the problem you thought.
Even if there is this problem, it does not need to be solved by Wonders.

You obviously don’t understand why the current Sohei Archers must be able to build Shrines.
You have a lot of fantasies about cultural meaning, but little understanding of how game mechanics exist.

Wrong, most of them didn’t.
With the exception of previous generations, they became a wealthy and privileged class. They may have nominal military power, but in fact, it is often the generals from the military who really knew how to fight and manage the army, and many of these generals were Han Chinese. Not to mention, it is highly unlikely that they will be leaders of new towns in the new world. These nobles basically did not leave Beijing because in fact the nobles of the Qing Dynasty had no fiefs, which makes them very different from other land lords in the world like the daimyo.

Your insistence makes me think you have a fantasy instead of understanding about Asian nobility.

The explorer-like part is one of the keys to making them suitable for heroes. In the game, the most important meaning of hero’s existence is to build TPs and to scout actually. Not only do Cartographers and Armed Caravan Leaders replace religious stereotypes while maintaining original mechanics, they also fit well with the meaning of hero’s existence.

I already rename it to “Abbot”. He just becomes a healer who has stronger combat ability than other healers.

It is precisely because the stereotypes are so severe that the Asian civs are expected to be reworked. Since you don’t care about stereotypes, all change is pointless.

Yeah. Emir is already used to be the Hausa hero.

Indian hero can just be named Zamindar.
Zamindar was the landlord so it fits to be the leader of new towns in the game.

Fair points, the goal was to keep it as similar to the current Daimyos as possible while compensating for them becoming invincible. Daimyos are already essential and annoying so I don’t think it makes Japan any worse, but it also doesn’t make them any less annoying. A change to how Daimyos work would probably be needed to make them less annoying. Maybe just removing their auras altogether would work. That way every battle wouldn’t just be a rush to snipe them out.

I think the solution for Japan is pretty simple: Only allow one daimyo, which can be trained/shipped from the shogunate, and then add new cards to open up new strategies, similar to how China and Birtish were treated lately. I am not yet sure what the cards should be, but that is brainstorming for another thread. Particularly, Japan need a viable alternative to shrine booming. One that is not an all-in (maybe increase food gathering speed but also increase shrine cost idk).

Once new strategies open up, we can start messing with some of the more annoying things.

You also need to keep in mind that the golden pavilion aura is just another way of doing what other Asia civs do via cards or consulate, so in that regard, it isn’t anything special. Tying it to the daimyo is an unnecessary nerf.

1 Like

I just don’t like the idea of pseudo-heroes like Daimyos and Mansabdars. They should just be proper heroes, and making them replacements for weird mystical monk heroes kills two birds with one stone.

I’ve got some ideas for reducing Shrine booming but that does need a new thread. The most obvious thing would be to separate Shrines from Houses. Making Shrines more like Mountain Monasteries and having Kannushi function like Abuns could be one way to go with it.

What bothers me about Golden Pavilion is just how inconsistent it is. Maybe if there were other buildings where you selected bonuses it would make more sense (that could make sense for Arsenals). Right now it just kind of an oddity that would probably just work better with a passive bonus.

How is it inconsistent? it works exactly like factories or community plaza.