There doesnt have to be one civ to have fun with another in AoE games. Would be a different story in games like europa universalis, when just one nation is ■■■■■■■ missing.
Something like uyyamid calaphate.
Sounds more accurate
Spanishs fought aganist arabians-berbers and mesoamericans?
I can’t see mesoamericans or arabians/berbers?
Quick question: Do you think the berbers in iberia should be split from the rest of the muslins? For a long time the uyyamid controlled pretty much all that was muslin, sooo…
Yes,i agree.But they must be in a dlc.they were important for fall of byzantine.
Byzantines fought aganist arabians in early medieval.(700-900)
But look at 11th century-13th century era,they fought aganist seljuk turks.also seljuks important for crusades.
Manzikert(1071)
First Crusade(1091-1095)
Myriokephalon(1176)(Aganist Byzantines)
byzantine are not greek, yes both of them they were speak greek but they belong to different civilizations.
because greek were pagans, and byzantine were christian orthodox and religion in medieval age was something very important.
byzantine was very important civlazation in medieval age, byzantine not greek i hope you people not mix up between madieval age and ancint age.
what about to add andalusia, it was important in medieval age and the
architecture of andalusia its diffrent from the architecture of middle east
andalusia architecture
middle east islamic architecture
1 Like
I was thinking about the time frame 1200 and beyond the latins did sack and occupy Constantinople and during the last stand italian mercs were the army defending the capitol.
We can call pretty much all of europe German as france germany england are all germanic tribes at one time.
What language is “Indian”?
LoL
I disagree, the Persians still had a large influance in the reagion after the Sassanid Empire, culturally as well as militarily. The Persian civ was’nt wiped off the face of the earth, instead they allied themselves with the Arabs,Turks,Mongols and more. Even Up to the Third Crusade you had Persian Armies fighting allingside and against the Crusaders,Mongols,Turks and Arabs. You don’t need to have a vast empire such as Ghengis Khan to be a regional power.
Lesser kingdoms still had IMMENSE POWER AND INFLUANCE ON THE MEDIEVAL WORLD. Hense why I want to have civs such as Poland,Armenia and Georia added to the game, all of them as well as Persia fielded strong armies that had considrable effect even up to the reign of the Ottomans. So Persia more than deserves to be in this time period, as well as many more neglected civs that most peolpe never care to increase their knowledge on.
1 Like
This is so stupid, the world is to richly filled with history to only give 10 civs in AoE4. They shiuld rather take their time and add all the civs we currently have for DE as well as Poland,Armenia and Georgia. It iwll take a lot of work and time, but we have waited such a long time for AoE4, I’d happily wait longer to have a propper filled game with all Medieval civs.
1 Like
I believe in my initial response i said the japanese could be switched with the arabs.
I dont really understand your response in general. I said that spain was in my opinion important to a medieval game and you ask where mesoamericans are? If you mean if spain is so important where are the natives then here is my answer: Aztecs, and Incas didnt exist until around 15th century. And then you are talking about renaissance and mostly the beginning of the time period of AoE III. And for a medieval game natives are in my opinion less important then the onces i posted.
Its never going to be a game with ALL medieval civs. definatly not like they said what they are going to do. They are going to make every civ unique with unique units and buildings. How do you espect them to make the around 300 nations all unique in a game. Lol like 10 of those already take like 1-2 years to make in programming and modeling. Dont underestimate the work put into such things.
In my free time I do in deapth historical reasearch in order to make mods that allow each civ in AoE2DE to have unique and historically accurate skins so I know exactly how long it takes and how much work it takes to have such diversity. I do this without getting paied, I simply do it because I have a passion for history ,especially the Medieval era . I do not fault the devs for not including all that there is, I just know that it is possible to have all the civs we currently have in DE as well as more , I hope they might start with 10 civs or so and greatly expand on that with multiple DLCs and updates that I shall be happy to pay for.
1 Like
its not really colonial? and they were pretty different and iconic for the time period.
also,
so you might know how long it takes for skins… but what you’re asking for with this is a bit different. They want the civs to all be vastly unique and different from each other and play differently hinting at the britions castles and cities against mongols nomadic style.
doing this for over 30 civs is a TALL order making them all balanced and unqiue especially if the hints they don’t have the same tech tree like in 2 are true. Like I get where you’re coming from theres a lot of history and civ ideas but it still needs to be reasonable especially as a competitive game.
2 Likes
Europe:
1.Frenchs
2.Germans
3.Englishs
4.Byzantines(or Greeks)
5.Vikings
Asia:
6.Mongols
7.Chinese
8.Japanese
Africa&Middle East
9.Arabs
America:
10.Incas
DLC’s
Asia:
11.Indians
Barbarians:
12.Goths
13.Huns etc.
Americas:(maybe)
14.Spanish/Portugal
15.Aztecs
16.Mayans
17.and maybe a north america tribe
Others:
18.Turks
19.Russians
2 Likes
I believe Omkar means Christain civs (not colonial ).
Europe:
1.Frenchs
2.Germans
3.Englishs
4.Turks
5.Thracians(or Byzantines)
6.Spanishs
7.Russians(or Slavs)
8.Vikings
Africa&Middle East
9.Arabs
10. Some black skin tribe as
America:
10.Incas
DLC’s
Asia:
11.Chineses
12.Japaneses
13.Indians
14.Mongols
Barbarians:
15.Goths
16.Huns etc.
Americas:
(maybe)
16.Aztecs
17.Mayans
1 Like
Really we don’t need 30 civs,make balance is so hard 30 civs.And they must make next games(maybe aoe5,coh3,dow4),they can’t create a lot of dlc similar to aoe2.
probably they will make a game with 8-10 civs.
and with dlcs,civ number increase to 15-16
1 Like