For a start, when people think of medieval Europe, Serbia or Croatia are not countries that typically come to mind. Even if they are great civs, the thing is, I, and it seems most other people have reached post-saturation point with Euro civs, and would rather see some African, Indian, or Asian civs. That’s what’s wrong with Croatia and Serbia.
2 Likes
That’s because they are not taught and they only know about West Europe. So this a a good reason not to include?
Ideally nothing stops more of any of those.
3 Likes
That we dont need more Euro civs and Croatia and Serbia are also just very meh civs considering the other options. Imo not more euro civs until the 49th civ. Not even Armenians
1 Like
The thing is, theres rn a technical limit
I prefer Georgians. But i was only saying yes to serbs and croats for the sake of this thread lol…
I prefer Georgians too but for a long time I rather not add anything from.the European late middle ages (Burg, Bohe, Poles)or redundant (Sicilians although you could extend the argument to all four civs being represented well by Franks, liths or Teutons)
1 Like
@anon63664082 : This thread has long been dead (6 months). There’s no reason why this should be active.
Why does that matter 