Cataphract Archer as 2nd UU

I think @TriRem could definetly look over it and say if there need to be adjustments

I advice not to tag someone twice

It’s their choice to check here, so better to not keep tagging them

(Off-Topic but better to be said)

1 Like

Whoops sorry m8 dident mean to tag him eventho mine was just to advice that he should look over it

image
NOTE: Unique Tech gives Unique Unit, Cavalry Archer and Steppe Lancer +3 vs Infantry

1 Like

I think it sounds like a very cool idea, but would it overpower the byzantines too much? Or would it change their civ identity too much? I’m afraid this would turn into them becoming more of a CA civ then a defensive civ. Just some things to think about.

Here’s an idea, first remove the attack bonus against spears, then add that Logistica also effects the Cataphract archer unit, maybe not the trample aspect, as I’m not sure how that would work, but the +6 attack vs infantry. That would further incentivize researching that tech, which would indirectly buff Cataphracts themselves since there’s more situations where going to them is the right option (since you’ll usually get the logistica tech.) So they still don’t have Parthian tactics, but the Logistica tech applying to them is ultimately more powerful.

Finally, as a balance adjustment remove arbs from byzantine. So they are still a trash/defensive civ until imp, when they can ultimately get to two powerful units. But they can also start massing CA on Castle, though you’ll want to be careful with them missing bloodlines.

1 Like

No, that’s a bad idea. Arbs are really important for byz and any hypothetical CA unit would not be able to substitute them in a cost effective way.

Oh I know they are super important, I play arbs 100% of the time I’m byzantines. But I think they would need some counter active nerf if we add a chataphract archer, since I’d say they are currently in a pretty good place.

1 Like

I like this idea since CA is the only current unit without a 3rd update.

1 Like