Alternatively let the Archery Range and Stable use the second page like the Dock currently does. imo devs getting rid of the Dock’s 2nd page is a mistake.
Regarding the actual topic at hand:
Give Khmer and Burmese both EA and SE.
Give Malay EA but not AE.
Don’t give Vietnamese either, you can leave them with HCA and Rams.
Can give more variations to future SEA civs like Chams, Mon and Siamese.
Big no. Replacing rams by siege elephants kills infantry plays because they cannot be garrisoned. Malay/Vietnamese/Burmese have beautiful infantry, Khmer can do stuff too although it’s not usually their best play. I don’t want them to be nullified.
That’s not what Armoured Elephants are. Note how any melee unit does tons of damage to them.
Armoured Elephants represent South Asian siege tactics, where they never invented Battering Rams, and used elephants with specialist equipment instead. You can see this on doors of surviving Indian castles that have anti-elephant spikes built to try and repel them.
Only share EAs with SEA civs without sharing Armoured Elephants. If Armoured Elephants were also shared with SEA civs, then South Asian civilizations would lose every their unique regional unit.
Then the potential Siamese civ could have a bonus or a UT to boost their Battle Elephants against defensive buildings, meybe.
There is no archeological, written or otherwise evidence that South Asian civilisations used battering rams. They used elephants instead and never needed to invent them.
Using something heavy to batter down a gate is not rocket science,Are you suggesting people in asia were so primitive that they did not know how to do this simple task?
Necessity is the mother of invention. If you don’t need something, then it doesn’t get invented. That’s why calling other cultures primitive for not having the same tech is pointless.
When you ALREADY HAVE THE ANIMAL, you do not need the log.
This is what I am trying to tell you.
Clearly not a problem South Asian civilisations suffered from. Because AGAIN, there is no evidence of battering ram use, so clearly what they were doing didn’t need them.
This is so wrong… on so many levels.
Just remind you, imagine now the picture of running an army of elephants into a stone wall.
Please guys and girls. Nobody of us knows what exacly was then. But it’s pretty sure for me running eles into stone walls would be considered animal abuse even THEN. Maybe they didn’t used rams, but they surely had other ways than running elephants into stone defences, that makes no sense.
They they used armoured elephants to batter gates down. If you read my earlier posts, you would have seen those words.
Are we really doing this again? Questioning another non-European unit’s entire existence? Why don’t we just remove camels, elephants, fire lancers, eagle warriors…any regional unit…just in case.