Greece civ When will it arrive

You keep taking what I’m saying in a vacuum. You have to look at countries from multiple perspectives to judge if they can be considered major or minor. While I think cultural success and spheres of influence are the largest determiners, you cannot overlook their other achievements such as how “it controlled about a third of the continent, and won a war against France.” That’s why I made this point. Those things alone do not make Mexico a major power, but it helps its case certainly.

This is sort of becoming a hydra-argument, but I’ll entertain this. You could probably consider the fledgling US a minor power, but after The War of 1812, it had cemented itself as the dominant power of the North American East Coast (oh look, another country proving itself be winning a defensive war). Edit: I was wrong about this. It would probably take a few more decades for the US to be major
And if not the Solomonic Dynasty of Ethiopia, who else is the major power of (a place almost as large as Europe) the Horn of Africa? Before, during, and after colonization they thoroughly proved themselves as the major influence of the region.

So does territory matter or not? lol. In fact I think these help it’s case, because a country beset by so many warring sides obviously has a fair amount of influence worth cutting into. You don’t see a million invasions in Canada, partly because it has less influence over the map than Mexico did. I’m trying to make less analogies because they bog the conversation down, but the same thing happened with China during the 1800s. The Qing was struggling against constant invasions and rebellions, but it remained the dominant power of China despite that. So too Mexico.

No there wasn’t. Northern Italians and Southern Italians are both infamous for considering themselves wildly different from each other, to say nothing of inter-regional feuds. There is far less separatism in Mexico-proper even though it actually does cover a lot of different little cultures and ethnic groups. Again, this speaks to how strong it’s influence was/is.

1 Like
  1. This was an offensive war for the USA
  2. It was a stalemate even though Britain was busy with Napoleon
  3. USA was most definitely still a minor power at this point

No one. A region having no major powers is totally possible.

Qing was a major world power before that. And it declined so much it is called the century of humiliation. Mexico didn’t start off so strong.

You have such a low bar to qualify something as a “major” power we’re not ever going to agree on this.

2 Likes

You yourself considered pre-colonial Portugal and the Netherlands to be major powers because of their influence. I don’t see how my examples are lesser.

Ottomans at least yes, Italians it may be if you consider Venice…

Oh why?..I didn’t know they had said that, well goodbye Balkan DLC then…

Ah, it seemed to me, because I didn’t remember them ever saying anything about new civs…

Yes, that is, you can add the Greeks simply for the historical continuity of the saga…

Now, calm down, you are both right…

European attention had been focusing on the region for colonial expansion for much of the last part of the 19th century. The French in particular had sent multiple exploratory missions to the area to assess colonial opportunities after 1870.

They’ll put it in at some point…

That’s true, between 1840 and 1867, Mexico was a political mess between liberals and conservatives, revolutions, American and French interventions and the second empire…

Mainly due to Italian immigration to America…

Yes, they would think that modern Greeks are Persians or Scythians xd…

Well, the United States doubled its size with Louisiana purchase and from there began the Monroe doctrine that maintains it to this day…

2 Likes

This is the most nonsense comment I have encountered over these forums ever (also out of topic, at least). Gongrats to you for your talent to produce nonsense comments (like you have interviewed the dead, or you can speak on their behalf), and to those who liked already such a comment, @Dumuzi and @SirBarnzy1.

Also, seems that your brains can’t even do the reverse thought, and ask whether you wouldn’t view the future inhabitants of your countries’ area (who would have retained at least one cultural element, the language for example) as evolved result of your culture.

I don’t think it was that serious. I just think an ancient Greek would find themself in a pretty unfamiliar environment in modern Greece. They don’t worship Zeus, the language is slightly different, they wear completely different clothing. Nobody said Modern Greek weren’t Greek, just that cultures change over time.

What you point out is reasonably agreed, many things change over time. I wanted to point out that it’s silly to do/support statements like @RhythmicBoar556’s, because with that logic, not even classical Greeks would be considered Greeks to the Bronze age Greeks… and that’s not a logical thought to culture study. It doesn’t make any sense to us the moderns, and obviously.

1 Like

Wow, that’s an unwarranted response.

I can ‘like’ what I want and factually ancient Greeks would probably find modern Greeks quite different (even taking a single Greek state like Sparta - culturally they’d find modern Greeks different!) just as ancient British Celtic tribes finding modern Brits rather different. Sure they there may be some shared cultural links however there’s clearly differences that would be apparent.

Anyway despite my ‘like’, the original comment was a little veering away from the topic. Let’s move on.

2 Likes

Since you know factually much about how particular Greek city-state citizens would find modern Greeks, as well as Celts the modern Brits, etc… tell us 1) how they would find Medieval Greeks, and 2) how Bronze age Mycenaean Greeks would find the classical Greeks of the city-states… nobody deserves to “be viewed” as Greek all of a sudden… and then think if liking controversial, unscientific, and silly (in the end), out of topic comments, is beneficial to anything besides to the actual topic.

1 Like

My…someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning.

3 Likes

Not to stray too far from this topic, I’m surprised there isn’t an Albanian revolution option in the game. Albanians fought off the Ottoman Empire for 50 years.

I feel like that’s worth a mention.

That could just be the Egyptian civ, which was governed at the time by Albanians.

2 Likes

That would be a great way to include them.

Not every nation needs to be represented in a revolution or standalone civ. Nations like Switzerland have units like Swiss Pikemen and Papal Guards to represent them. Similarly, Albanians are represented by Stradiots.

3 Likes