Most likely it will be with the same engine as aoe 4…
That is pressuming that it will be done by Relic, which could be a completely open question at this point. I would even guess that it’s unlikely that it would be Relic again.
Of course, at least in that he had a lot of variety, from archaic soldiers with swords and shields to gatling machine guns …
That would be the imperial age of aoe 3, although it could also be a first age of a twentieth century aoe…
Of course you are right, that is, the games are more represented by their later units…
Bro… AoE I isn’t pre-historic. Pre-historic would be like caveman ■■■■.
1 Like
In age of empires 1 we start in the stone age.
Stone Age Description
The Stone Age or also Lithic Stage is the period of prehistory that covers from when human beings began to make stone tools to the discovery and use of metals.
I think in a time from WWI on it would fit more to make mining machines for gold, stone, wood and food.
Villagers would realistically have to die with a rifle shot.
But I think Age of Empires should not go over the time of AOE3. There are already other strategy games set there. For example Red alert, Command and conquer, Starcraft 2.
Also I think a time from the first world war or later does not fit Age of Empires.
It happens that to some extent it could be confused since it is considered that prehistory lasts until 3000 BC when writing is invented (and as AoE 1 starts in the year 8000 BC because it can generate some confusion)…
1 Like
Of course, but after AoM DE, and that it comes out there of 2025…
Of course, but in order not to get so many problems, surely Microsoft would give the go-ahead to Relic to continue developing the saga…