I don’t totally agree but peace anyway 
Please do not provoke or send your own private information.
I guarantee you this thread will be deleted by mods as soon as they see it.
4 Likes
Firstly, the Turks (Ottomans) were not alone, but with Moravian Serbia, secondly, according to the latest data, they had more troops than the Crusaders, and thirdly, the main force was cavalry, horse archers and Sepoys (like the Boyars of the Slavs), there was no question of any superiority due to firearms, discipline and possibly a number led to victory. Stop with an alternative Turkish history, my friend! 
3 Likes
Although, the guys above have already pointed out your mistakes to you, I’m sorry I didn’t read their answers before my comment 
Ain’t that just what you want? Again?
Absolutely 100% unprovoked and absolutely 100% ad hominem. This thread is a total massacre of an army of haters against one free person. I’m ready. Bring it on! 
1 Like
“Latest data” huh 
Dude. K&G, HistoryMarche, Knowledgia etc. all disagree with your “latest data”… Crusade had more troops than the Empire. You’re wrong. Pointless to argue as figures still much disputed, and can never justify 24 armies losing to 1. Plus Moravian Serbia was the Bayezid’s son in law, not an independent sovereign. Should not be counted as a nation. Wrong again. I never said firearms decided Nicopolis, but early firearms were indeed used. Bombards were not, as the Ottomans were thwarting a siege, not besieging. You’re a bit lost huh.
1 Like
Here’s a look and who to believe is clearly not the Turks and not the contemporaries of the Europeans 
130 thousandth army of the Crusaders, and what is not 1 million? At that time, there were no conservs. If you link to a video from YouTube, well, you’re good, any of the interested parties can shoot such a video. So you made a mistake again
@XPUltar Exactly so David Nicole provides the modern estimation. More Crusaders 16,000 than Empire forces 15,000. You’re wrong.
K&G estimates 25,000 Crusade, 20-25,000 Ottoman. Again wrong. Same for HistoryMarche and Knowledgia. You’re wrong again.
You can’t justify the outcome of the war based on troop number discrepancy, period. Capisce? 
1 Like
Incredible MEGA Battles of History 800 to 1500 - AoE4 DLC Campaign Ideas, Episode 2
MEGA BATTLE OF VARNA, 1444 - The “Crusade of Varna”, The LAST CRUSADE
Before the Great Bombards built in Turkey (1451), before the world-changing invention of the musket in Turkey (1465)
Many European “Civs” join hands to Destroy the Empire Again, get Obliterated Again
“Knowledgia”: “Ottoman Empire Becomes a Superpower in Varna”
Very well produced video by Knowledgia (a Western view on the Battle of Varna, the LAST CRUSADE ):
Destroyed: Hungarians, Polish, Bohemians (HRE), Wallachians, Czechs, Germans, (Holy Roman Empire), Croatians, Bulgarians, Bosnians, Serbians, Teutonic Knights, Lithuanians all together (with assistance from Venice, Burgundy and Ragusa)
Victorious: Ottoman Empire (Turks), alone, again
1 Like
I do not dispute the outcome of the war, Europeans and Turks are the same for me. But you are clearly exaggerating the merits of the Turks, not even the Turks, but the Ottoman Empire. I can’t believe your words without facts, links to videos by unknown authors are not such 🤷
7 Likes
You don’t even want anything this time. Your posts are just getting really annoying and pointless. Ottomans and Byzantines can be in a DLC, I really don’t care either way. The base civs aren’t changing, so can you stop with these repetitive posts now? Also, your habit of calling people weird names is really annoying and it would be nice if you stopped it.
6 Likes
I hope for u ottomans will be never added to aoe 4. You photoshop stuff, writing propaganda. People find out about it u start talking weird stuff. What a loser.
2 Likes
No? I’ve never asked for anyone’s private info here.
Stop fighting ghosts.
He is probably gonna be angry when Turks get added and they aren’t an insta-win civ or at least incredibly overpowered.
Everyone thinks the Turks should be in the game. No one is denying that, but the way you speak is just so ■■■■■■■ weird man. No one is gonna take you seriously if you don’t talk like a normal person. Why do you mention Turkish inventions all the time? Why to you say “MEGA battle” all the time, like a little kid would? Why do you bold random words? Why did you edit the Wikipedia screenshot to remove the Serbian allies?
These kind of posts, and the fact that you have the Dardanelles Gun/Great Turkish Bombard as a profile pic makes me think you’re spreading some kind of propaganda. If you’re not a Turkish ultra-nationalist, then stop talking like one, it’s weird and makes you look stupid.
12 Likes
Very well said, I would agree that the Ottomans should have been added before the Rus but they are not so at this point just wait for a dlc.
2 Likes
This topic is temporarily closed for at least 4 hours due to a large number of community flags.
This topic was automatically opened after 12 hours.
Thank you ai, for your nice reaction.
The one who programmed you did it rigth.
1 Like