Sí, igual me refiero a la población de colonos europeos que llegaron en las inmigraciones europeas de finales del siglo XIX, ya sé que esos territorios tenían nativos que fueron corridos por los ejércitos nacionales, como pasó en toda la historia…
Sí, por algo los marcan con rayas en los mapas de la época, era un control solo nominal de las administraciones coloniales y posteriormente, nacionales…
Sí, o sea no es que eramos colonias de España, sino que eramos España como tal…los españoles americanos eran criollos y los de la metrópoli eran peninsulares…como los criollos no querían pertenecer a la España napoleónica, empezaron las revoluciones (sumado también a cuestiones sociales y económicas que no hay que dejar de lado)…además las limitaciones de movimiento en la época y los nativos limitaba la correcta cartografía de los territorios virreinales…
Maybe I’m wrong, but aren’t the colonies supposed to have more autonomy, while the viceroyalties have to respond to a viceroy who was born on the peninsula who prioritizes the interests of the metropolis?
For example, the reason why Argentina celebrates May 10, 1810 is because it was the first time that the government was made up of those born in the territory. (obviously through revolutionary action)
Nah, every colony had to respond to the Metropoli in one way or another. The Viceroyalties were created mostly as a system of administration to handle an empire of unprecedented size, but it was still just a local subdivision of colonial administration.
It could be okay to suggest latin american “civs”, but most I see is based on late 18th to 19th century. Best example: an age2 “halbardier” that is actually a 19th century unit. Wtf? If you want a larger audience to be interested in this stuff, it might be a good idea to suggest things that are relevant to the whole timeframe.
So I’ve got a musician working on the civ theme, and I contacted one of those people who draws for those military miniature books whom I met in the Argentine videogame expo and at least on that front I’m in pretty good shape.
I’m porting the WoL Argentine bset and the models honestly translate pretty well to DE, textures were so unnecessarily detailed they make the transition almost seamlessly.
I’m having problems with the unit skins, since I don’t know anyone who does them and has free time atm.
Designwise, the Homecity is giving me issues, finding info about Argentine regional history proved to be a tad bit harder than anticipated, but on paper the federal Age up style fits perfectly.
The main part of the civ is pretty solid, I think, changes may still come as I test the civ and whatnot.
¿No conoce a nadie que te pueda ayudar? es una lastima.
Por eso dije que había que corroborar sus fuente y su información, es tecnología muy reciente y poco fiable.
Esta es solo mi opinión, pero si solo es la parte estética, quizás te convenga utilizar alguna de manera provisoria y luego cambiarla por una personalizada. Quizás la metrópoli revolucionaria estándar o alguna de las de la campaña.
You can literally say that the USA was born when Poland was dying out. Kościuszko and Puławski became heroes of the victorious uprising in the USA, although they lost the uprising in Poland.
Exactly! These people ignore entire time frames in favor of one century. The result is a total lack of coherence between the presentation of civs from the perspective of each Age.
