In fact, only Mexico and Ethiopia are very problematic, but Mexico is the worst of all.
Mexico in the treaty is so out of the curve that it has its own tier.
below the Mexico tier comes the S+ tier with Germany, Ethiopia and Haudenosaunee
It’s funny, i’d assume lategame economically strong civs would be outcompeting the Hauds, seeing as their normal economy and farm eco is honestly far too bad.
Is that all on livestock basis?
As for mexico, mexico is logically good in lategame eco, whilest in supremacy their performance is lackluster.
Cows plus 10 extra vills plus fur trade, being the only civ with livestock and fur trade.
About military, they get a powerfull mass of canons, mantles, and prowlers, while in treaty maps there are enough trees to sustain it.
In fact, I aim for removing pop reduction for light canons.
honestly, i think if they remove the pop reduction on the light cannon they could allow it in age 3, which would improve supremacy hauds whilest nerfing lategame a tad.
Still not sure you could get away with that. Light Cannons are super strong even without any cards. I think it’d likely create a number of issues in sup. In 1v1s basically no one sends the -1pop card. Toma-LC would totally become the new age 3 comp, and I believe LCs are cheaper than Culvs.
Plz god light canonns age3 go ahead and needlessly nerf prowlers another 4 5 x im willing to make that trade.
Imagine all the salt id see nuking every musk falc ladder boi into oblivion makes me…well cant say that on a aoe3 forum!
oh no… people need to build a culv or two to kill the lowest HP cannon 
Yes, the natives are not the problem, but the civilizations that seek to use them.