‘too controversial to talk about’ soy
if you want stereotypes to be thrown around in the forum then sure go ahead. There is a reason why Rus and many Chinese civs doesnt exist for a reason.
chinese civs are now coming!
The Jewish people were in the diaspora and did not control an empire during the timeline of the game, it doesn’t make sense to have them as a civ.
3 Likes
Even more less likely with the current world events.
1 Like
Yall giving serious responses to an elaborate trollpost
1 Like
Oh boy good luck getting that civ out.
it does, timeline has been extended to 400 BC
wtf are you talking about?
I think he is referring to the Chronicles dlc.
The maccabean revolt would be a nice campaign element.
Yes, it would be cool to have a Battle of Conquerors type called “Enemies of Rome” where you can play as both sides, Romans or their enemies from various regions: Cleopatra, Decebalus, Pyrrhus, Boudica, Hannibal, Viriathus, Arminius, Zenobia, Vercingetorix, Julius Civilis, Tacfarinas, Amanirenas, Bar Kokhba and any others you can think of.
1 Like
Again: joke post. Troll. Dont feed it!!!
that would be really cool. I guess however that they would put that into “Return of Rome”
I think the bigger problem is people necroing a dead thread.
2 Likes
@EliteRiflemann Could you lock this thread? It’s not adding anything of value.
2 Likes
I really don’t see a reason, people haven’t touched on controversial topics again, but I’ll keep an eye on them though.
Thats like a separate game.
With 3k becoming a thing now there is nothing holding back adding kingdom of jerusalem or any other crusader state or order ingame.