Maybe Centurion or Elite Leitis
If with micro then Ballista Elephant would be a good choice to counter Mamelukes
Elite Hussite Wagon will be a good choice too
If you ignore is again im report you as troll.
To repeat and you better have a good answer: WHY DID YOU LET THEM MAKE SO MANY GOLD HEAVY UNITS UNDISTURBED!?
1 Like
He play team game michi
2 Likes
you mean those guys who play DM michi with a treaty on it sometime? 11 imagine you play michi on a gamemode that supposed to rush at each other the first minutes. I dont even call them DM players honestlyā¦
1 Like
Maybe try learning to play in a normal setting
2 Likes
Onager is fine IMO. It wonāt be able to kill anything other than building if you remove attack ground.
Mameluks are overpower in low elo games where people donāt know the timing. In this case, War elephant and ballista elephant are overpowered too.
60 camel archers can fight. or just spam trash units.
I believe he has a misconception of counter. By his idea, halbs is not a counter of cavalier. I think monks arenāt that bad against mameluke.
1 Like
Just make Turtle ships or war Elephants 
1 Like
Depends on if you can micro or not. This is pretty important for mamelukes because they have an extremely short range of 4. I wouldnāt go against halbs in the late game with mamelukes unless Iām sure I can babysit them because if you canāt, the halbs will eat your mamelukes.
where is ur video proof?
Anyone that wants to prove me wrong shall upload a video where it can clearly be seen how a generic unit beats mamelukes
1 Like
You need onagers to counter archer masses and other masses of unit that are too strong in groups.
1 Like
lol, u just confirmed they are too strong
1 Like
I think youāre missing the point. If you only make a ton of elite skirm and halberdiers and send them to their death vs Mamelukes, that could still be a good trade because you are trading trash units for expensive gold units. The Saracen player is on a timer and cannot replace his army when the gold runs out. Same argument applies for mass Hussar vs. Onager. 80 farms Hussar spam and thereās no way the Onager player can handle that level of micro without losing all his siege or friendly fire killing his own Onagers. And again, the Onager player canāt replace his army when the gold runs out.
3 Likes
Post it then. Letās see it.
In castle age, you have enough gold to spam them, castles are the limiting factor. In imperial, pop space is just as much of an issue. Even if the trade is fine, you lose map control and momentum.
Also, skirmishers have no bonus damage against mamelukes. For some reason, they are not counted as cavalry archers. For this reason, mamelukes will eat skirms.
2 Likes
Iāve asked for your video proof theyāre uncounterable already and you havenāt posted a video yet.
3 Likes
Mamelukes have 3 range (typo I imagine). Also regarding the micro, if you think about it itās similar to arbs vs champions. Arbalesters counter champions (no one disagrees here) but if you donāt micro your arbs the champions win.
1 Like
Yes, but the micro window is far too tight with mamelukes. Arbs have a huge range. So, you can easily attack enemies from behind, say, halbs. You can have a good meatshield, or sit in the range of a casttle. Mamelukes canāt do that. That makes them far more difficult to use. You need to babysit them a lot more.
1 Like
For sure, I just donāt think itās fair to say either mamelukes or halbs win by default. Iāve seen games where the babysitting is more than possible (black forest likely). Iāve also definitely seen games where the mamelukes get overwhelmed.
1 Like
mamelukes are some of the strongest counters against skirms, skirmishers are meant to die hard to mamelukes
2 Likes
Domt feed the trolls
3 Likes