Supper Paladin+ gold bonus killer enemy, ???
Damage = Paladin
Armor/ p armor, 3-4 p a still= tarkan but stronger very much, train= stable 
good bye all I can versus all Pesian said. Supper bonus :)) good good micro, + bonus castle too, :v
2 Likes
Paladins for dinner! Tasty
4 Likes
Paladin never useful like savar:))). But new update I will auto pick Pesian 
because the Savar has 15 less hp than a paladin, it might take one fewer hits from halbs/camels (if not all the time maybe civ specific) as the bonus dmg is so high that one melee armor doesn’t make as big of a difference as 15 hp. Damage ignoring units, like the leitis, dravidian infantry, and the composite bowman will also do better.
Still where the Savar will be worse it will only be marginally worse, whereas against archers, and taking fire from defenses, it’ll be much better. It’s a trade off, one that I think the Savar is overall appreciably better, but still a tradeoff.
1 Like
a knight (or savar) needs to kill 25 (military!) units to get his own cost back, that’s a lot of kills for a melee unit. I think this bonus is more relevant for cav archers and hussars
Whatttt? 25 unit :))) when u play cavalry from cattle age, if from feudal age with scout
The savar also looks sick they should just replace the whole Persian knight line with savar and elite savar.
2 Likes
Another Bonus is, that the Upgrade is quite a Bit cheaper
1 Like
They also have +3 hidden bonus damage vs archers. Together with the Team bonus, that’s +5.
Total 14+4+5=23 damage to any range units, which is on the edge of being OP.
2 Likes
My friens, the word is spelled super with only one P
2 Likes
Oh I just know this now 
and + wood price archer tech best late game here
Devs of this game care about cavalry above everything else, it feels like.
I am so done with cavalry. I’d love an aoe2 like game with more focus on infantry and archers.
4 Likes
Wasn’t that like the thing in medieval armies? People with cavalry were always superior till the pike and shot tactics came.
3 Likes
There was most definitely a span of time where cavalry ruled. But if you compare that to the game, that time is mainly castle age to early imp.
Feudal scout dominance is silly. So is cavalry dominance in imperial age, as it is in the game. By the time of gunpowder, cavalry wasn’t nearly as dominant.
1 Like
Wait, arent you the one who in other thread is complaining about specialized archer with abolity to take down armored targets, such as… Cavalry?
If we will talkimg about proper medieval fights then Spearmen should be most popular unit. And gues what, they are preaty popular.
1 Like
Yes. Your point? Do you I think I’d root for unbalanced units just because I dislike cavalry?
They are also exceptionally weak and cannot do the things that infantry generally does, like construct fortifications and siege.
Did you just throw a bunch of random words into an “AI whine generator”?
2 Likes
Nope Use word I remember let write it
I know English is very likely not your first language, but…
wat
1 Like
I just make noitice for new persian update, it so strong :v, with savar I see the god in this unit + 1 kill = 5 gold :))