Celts are spending a lot more gold on their scorpions, and the Roman Scorpions still fire faster (due to UT) and have reduced minimum range. Celts do get more hp on their scorps (due to an expensive UT) and can produce them faster (assuming that they can afford them). But I think it’s hard to support a claim that Celt scorpion is way stronger than Roman Scorpions. Romans have an easier time massing them (gold savings > lower creation speed), deal a little more damage (due to Roman castle-age UT) - but it is easier to destroy Roman scorpions. I still consider Roman scorpions the best scorpions in the game (even above Khmer scorpions, though the two are pretty close in quality).
Yeah. But that was not the point I was making. After you reach the number, now Celts are better imho. Again, I can’t test Romans as I don’t have them. You can certainly disagree. And even run a test and show Romans are still better.
Also if you consider team games, Romans and Khmer TB can be stacked with Celts. I hope you won’t disagree Celts with any of the TB is better in QUALITY than other two.
1 Like