You mean Micro$oft lawyers are dumb enough to think that the words such as “Yemeni” or “Kurds” are controversial because of modern conflicts, and we’ll get “Rasulids” or “Ayyubids” instead?
…yeah, you’d probably be right, they are fairly stupid. Although they didn’t block the Mountain Royals release despite the war, so there’s a chance.
We already have 56 cis… if you had to pick 9 more to get 65 civs as a final number, wich ones would you pick? I know I would like 2 for every continent (americas, europe, asia) and 3 for africa.. but I only have 4 clear civs…
Venice and Serbia for europe, and tlaxcalans and tarascans for americas… maybe a sarracen split for asia, but I absolutely have no clue about african civs
I dont think 65 should be the final number.
civs I would like to see:
we would then have 75 Civs.
Final number should be 100.
There is evidence of a scrapped Azeri civ though.
Was it because of the war though, or did they simply lack time to finish them, or perhaps decided to implement their stuff into the reworked Persians instead? (Perhaps the Citadels tech was originally Azeri)
Nubians
Somali
Swahili
Vlachs
Serbs
Croats
Albanians
Tanguts
Tibetans
I would have made separate polls for Chronicles and the base game.
A lot of people also want a 2nd “Forgotten” DLC that doesn’t focus one one region of the world.
Africa has 3 civs. North America has 0. Even if you count Mexico and Central America as “North America”, Africa has had more and more recent content.
Give me Algonquians so I have any reason to replay Karlsefni.
It makes sense. Azerbaijan is a Caucaus state, neihbour of Georgia and Armenia. Azerbaijanians/Azeris could be in the Mountain Royals DLC. Let me guess. UU was Qizilbash, UT was Citadel, Campaign was Ismael. Ismael and his fallowers were Turcomans. Playing Ismael as Persians isn’t accurate. Moreover his Qizilbash ally is Tatars. I wonder why did they scrap.
It would appear that support for an Oceania DLC is severely limited.
I’d say that the Safavids did become a Persian dynasty, but the in-game Persians with elephants aren’t fit for his campaign. Turcomans/Azeris designed with the later period in mind would fit better.
Hey, I’d love to see them! The issue is that we can only cast two votes in the poll, so after voting for North Americans and Africans I can’t vote for Oceanians.
Do we have anything in the game currently pointing to the next DLC like we had the animals for TLC and the flag for TVS?
Only thing we know, that the reserved graphics indicate, that there is likely a new architecture set. But we don’t know more yet.
So probably not Africa because that would require two.
Hopefully. But could also be north America, Himalaya, nomads or something completely unexpected.
Roman Republic would be a lot more than that, you can’t skip the Punic Wars
Saffavids did become a Persian dynasty in AoE3 timeline I think. Reforms during Abbas I (1587-1629) can be a breaking point. In 16. century Saffavids was still Turkic.
If there’s a graphics set in the data then reverse data from the files should show the units right?
The entries are there but empty. No pictures yet