that is very true
however they did already refrain from splitting china
india however is hardly less deserving,
an expansion that separates asian countries would be nice to include both
lets call it
the great divide!
or is that too much?
these are Mongolian civs
i honestly donāt care, i just think they need a little more love in general, representation and single player. i mean for the love of god, all they have even single player wise is a single historic battle.
by less deserving i mean china has been in the game longer and needs to be looked at first. India at least has a full campaign, and didnāt even get introduced until the forgotten, and people are always talking about giving them love. everyone literally ignores the chinese who have been in game longer, and yet āIndia deserves to be split the mostā?
good point, china needs a split to and it could be in the same expansions that splits india so we dont receive too many expansions
however the part about everyone giving india love supports the other side when it comes to
MARKETING
iām fine with that. but frankly, this is all purely speculation and fun anyway.
anyways im having trouble finding 15 civs for that crisp 50 w are waiting for,china can add its own civs to the list
sofar i have chola, sinhalese, odiyas, iroquis, missisipians, swahili, zulu, mapuche, zapotec,
and then add jurchen tibetans and the others!
also, for the ioquis civ
does it make sense tosplit them into mohawk, huron, etc. so we dont get too much things like
āIroquis needs the most to be split into many civsā
iād add no more then 10 civs, were already seeing overlap in bonuses and stuff as is.
true, but there are the crazy stuff we can reach for
elephant skirmisher
camel lancer
arrow shower
etc.
and things like
this civ is focused on elephant rushing the enemy in dark age (though that is too op/impossible)
and also we NEED a civ that can use this
If this idea can be used in Age 2, it will also be very innovative and very interesting. I would love to see such a unit with this ability, that would provide attack strength to the other adjacent units.
Did the Malagasy use Cavalry?
Tibetans is easy, Trash Knight and a Cavalry Slinger-Monk UU.
should help
i think the answer is yes
This was followed by a commercial treaty. On 23 October 1817, Radama signed a treaty negotiated by former military general James Hastie that granted Radama a formal alliance with the British crown and its recognition of Radama as āKing of Madagascarā in exchange for horses, uniforms and a pledge to abandon the export of slaves.[
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radama_I)
not sure what the sentence is saying though
what civ would have an arrow showering uu?
(or towers)
this is my planned new civs list,
Tamil
Iroquis
Missisipians
Taino
Odyias
Sinhalese
Swahili
Zimbabwans and/or Kongolese
Mapuche
Zapotec and/or Tarascans and/or Peublans
Malagasy
Khitans and/or Jurchen
also
(there is a no)
that was a typo
you are right
Zulu are not Medieval. If you want Medieval Bantu civs, go with Kongolese or Zimbabwans,
Zulus are actually a 19th century group, far removed from the Middle Ages.
We already have Aztecs. Tarascans or Puebloans would be far more distinct,
thank you, and about the other Chinese civs, which ones should i add?
Jurchen? Khitan? (im trying to make it 15 civs) hopefully give me one that has a
i know the koreans used them but once i had so many kipchaks that it was satisfying seeing all the arrows land on the ground
i want an arrow shower!
the aztecs were enemies of the zapotec, and i like the lightning warrior concept
also i accidentally mixed up zulu with zimbabwe
You could add both, or just one. The more Medieval one would be the Khitans, since Jurchen became the Manchus later on, an those are more on the AoE3 timeline.
oh those were examples, i was asking if you knew a good one
like a top 2-3 would be nice
Khitans would add the most to the game, I believe. With Crossbow Cavalry and Flamethrowers, and a Tech Tree that revolves around boosted Pikes, Heavy Cav Archers and Paladins, but everything else being bad.