Did you by any chance flag/report MY last post? Which was in response to someone elses post?
Because both my post and the post i had disputed have both disappeared?
I would consider my post to have been far more logical and not worthy of dismissal via having it removed. Since, my last reply did NOT contain any “ad hominem attacks”, which is the reason you assert as being the basis for which you committed to the action of flagging/reporting particular posts?
I merely referenced psychology and linguistics, in relation to group dynamics and personality types.
I also gave a complete “refutation” for anything subjective.
Simply put, one can “perceive” something (perception = personal subjectivity), yet everything is still objective.
An example would be the earth (it moves thousands of kilometres every second, yet we do NOT experience this movement “personally”).
personal experience = subjectivity
So if you “believe” that one’s “subjectivity” actually
exists and is even a valid metric, then the must by necessity of the logical framework (in order to maintain internal consistency in the argument FOR “subjectivity”), thus declare the earth to NOT be moving.
However, the simple fact is, we “know” the earth moves, however, this is NOT because of any “subjective experiece”. This is solely due to observation and experimentation. Using logically consistent frameworks by design.
Just to be clear. I was the one who was “accused” of being illogical by way of using “assumptions” which i did NOT make. There is perhaps the chance that the post i replied to merely misunderstood the argument i was putting forth, and i may have also failed to convey what i was stating accurately, yet that would still not excuse the actions which were undertaken.
By which i mean -
1). Accusing myself of making assumptions
2). Making assumptions after accusing myself of such a thing