I agree if there is ever a romanian civi it should have a cavalry uu since all the eastern european civis have mounted uus.
Everything is happening again.
There is a severe lack of Player870583437 this month.
Not a lot of links you can make beetwen South America and the Balkans
Please do not summon him.
And also, the only reason Iāve asked is that I do not want to make another thread for a civ that was already over-saturated with threads by a person that didnāt know that threads can be updated.
I never understood why he thought Romanians would get 3~5 campaigns when a lot of classic civs didnāt get even one. lmao
Me neither, like we already have Draculaās campaign which I think it is more memorable than any other campaign he mentioned. I wouldāve argue with Stephen the Great being introduced in V&V as a side-campaign, but that is more related to Moldovia than Wallachians, even if Vlad Dracula and him are related.
Besides, it is stupid to do like idk how many Iāve counted, 9 or more threads about a Civ. In a way youād be tired of seeing the same civ being told by a single person. Especially since he wrote them like novels.
Sometimes he (or someone else) would suggest representing the area by three or more civ, which is extra weird since there are much bigger areas covered by only one civ.
Which again, is stupid. Like Wallachians is the lower part of the Romania, reaching Carpathians Mountains but not reaching Brasov for example, which was in Transylvania, part of Hungary most of the time.
Just use Romanians as an umbrella with elements from all three principalities.
Yeah. Thatās an acceptable umbrella.
