ROR : map of existing and potential civs

[Mahazona]

Devs will keeping adding aoe2 content till they feel like its enough.Aoe2 content sells well compared to others.
Aoe content fully depends on this dlcs success.

[Temudhun]

Yeah, I was talking about new civs or updates for RoR, I have no doubt there will be new dlc’s in the future for the medieval side of the game.

[TommoChocolate]

@Akos

What’s the point of adding civilizations to aoe1? They all look the same, because they don’t have UU-s and UT-s.

They still have different bonuses and tech trees, and the differences between the base tech tree tend to be bigger in AoE1 than AoE2. That said, I think to justify adding new civs, there would need to be new generic units as well, to help distinguish the new civs from existing ones. Of course, some of the existing civs could get new units as well, just as they did in The Rise of Rome.

[PeakHornet46539]

You need to add the Etruscans.

[DukeOfLorraine]

@TommoChocolate

Of course, some of the existing civs could get new units as well, just as they did in The Rise of Rome.

Ideally they could add UUs (if only unique upgrades) and UTs, UTs for AOE2 did not exist in AOK and only appeared for The Conqueror.

[MatM1996]

@TommoChocolate

They still have different bonuses and tech trees, and the differences between the base tech tree tend to be bigger in AoE1 than AoE2. That said, I think to justify adding new civs, there would need to be new generic units as well, to help distinguish the new civs from existing ones. Of course, some of the existing civs could get new units as well, just as they did in The Rise of Rome.

@DukeOfLorraine

Ideally they could add UUs (if only unique upgrades) and UTs, UTs for AOE2 did not exist in AOK and only appeared for The Conqueror.

Yes, it can be, but that it maintains a certain reminiscence of AoE 1…

@PeakHornet46539

You need to add the Etruscans.

Etruscans, Samnites, the civs of northern Europe, Israel, Kush, Aksum, valley of the Indus, Mauryas, Guptas, Olmecs and Mayans…