Should the new naval changes for the DLC apply to regular play?

Looking at Spirit of the Law’s video on the Battle for Greece naval changes, I’d like to hear your thoughts on whether or not the changes should be applied to regular play.

Personally, I think they should. Water matches are very bland in regular AoE2 play, as the alleged triangle of counters doesn’t hold up in practice due to Demo Ships being far too impractical. The lack of a good ranged splash option (no pun intended) also hurts, as Dromons are only available in Imperial Age (by which point most water matches are already decided), not available to all civs, and are only so-so as a Mangonel substitute.

But, in particular, I think the Ramming Ship is something that’s desperately needed. A naval melee option would give players a real counter to Fire Galley spam and make things actually dynamic in Feudal Age. Plus, if the Fire Galleys have a real hard-counter, they can finally afford to be buffed since they wouldn’t be oppressive anymore.

The only problem I see is that players are used to how water maps are played in the base game, and performing such a huge overhaul would force them to relearn it. It would also make it trickier to build up your infrastructure since you’d have two types of naval facilities to construct, making it take longer to get military out. I think it’s worth it, though, for the sake of making water matches actually enjoyable.

Of course, I don’t think it should be carbon-copied from the DLC to the base game, but it could still be adjusted as needed to work better in the base game. That would require a bit of testing by the devs, but I trust they can get the balance right.

So, what do you think? Should the naval changes from the DLC be applied to the base game?

  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

I like the idea of the Onager ship particularly.
It is not good against buildings, it doesn’t even outrange towers, but it’s a good counter to massed Galleons on the late game.
Currently massed Galleons counter everything (besides a few unique ships).

But I don’t think it should be copied from Chronicles because Chronicles is about ancient warfare not medieval warfare.
AoE2 should have more medieval aspects like more cannons or arquebus on ships. For example a ship that fires a volley of bullets like an Organ Gun.

4 Likes

Sure, carbon-copying the Chronicles ships might not entirely fit, but at the very least there needs to be a ship available in Feudal (other than the Demo Raft) that hard-counters Fire Galleys and gets countered by regular Galley-line ships. A melee-range “ramming ship” could work (if not necessarily the Monoreme) because a lot of ship-to-ship combat in the medieval era was done via grappling and boarding.

2 Likes

I have some ideas for a water rework but I want to wait for Chronicles to release before I form my opinion on it.
I suggested some things in the past but it’s always better to try things then to just have a theory in the head.

I think Demo Rafts should be removed and there should only be 3 ships in Feudal that actually counter each other.
Castle and Imperial Age can then introduce additional ships including the Demo Ship and Cannon Galleon of course.

1 Like

How will it be different from Fire Ship? Aren’t both functionally the same?

Why are the ramming ships so tiny. Horrendous looking.

1 Like

I’m going to vote yes, but at the same time I think we need to see some gameplay with the new ships before we really start pushing for analogues to the Chronicles naval play being brought to the base game. I think there’s a lot of potential to the idea but lets not put the cart before the horse too much.

3 Likes

Not before the changes are known to be widely accepted by an overwhelmingly majority of the community.

1 Like

Personal idea, with reference to Chronicles and AoE4.

Port:

  • Fishing ships.
  • Trade Cogs.
  • Transport ships.
  • Explosive ships.
    The only unit here that are able to attack enemy.

Dock, or Shipyard:

  • Boarding warships.
    Having a projection, or ‘spur’, as a boarding platform in the bow, and dealing melee attack in a range of 1 or 2 probably.
    Having a high armor and a decent speed.
    Affected by Forging line upgrades.
  • Arrow warships.
    Firing multiple arrows, and would not change its projectiles after upgrades.
    Affected by Fletching line upgrades and Ballistics.
    The multiple arrows can naturally cause decent damages on Boarding warships.
  • Springald warships.
    Firing a ballista bolt. The farther range allows them naturally to be good at countering Arrow ships.
    A bolt cannot cause too many damage on Boarding warships due to the high armor, and the slow speed makes them easier to be chased by Boarding warships.
    Affected by Siege Engineers and Ballistics instead of Fletching line.
    After Chemistry, the projectile can become a bullet or a small cannonball since people replace the springalds with culverins and swivel guns.
  • Bombard warships / Dromons.
    Firing a cannonball or multiple stones. The attack is highest, the range is furthest, the speed is slowest, and the cost is highest. Better only use them to attack buildings even though they can also destroy ships.
    Affected by Siege Engineers obviously.

In conclusion, Boarding warships < Arrow warships < Springald warships < Boarding warships.
Use the Explosive ships to damage enemy ships which get close to your Ports.

Fire ships could be UU for Byzantines, replacing or not replacing the Boarding warships.
Longboats obviously would replace the Arrow warships for Vikings.
Turtle Ships could replace the Springald warships for Koreans. They could fire a bolt before Chemistry, and have strong survivability against Boarding ships.

Clearly the water battle mechanics of regular game need something new and changes for fixing.
It’s a issue for a long time. I remember that I seemed to have posted similar ideas before.

3 Likes

You can see how it works in SotL’s video:

1 Like

I like the idea of splitting Arrow and Springald ships but it’s kinda strange that Demo ships are the one military ship from the Port. I understand that the idea is that they are some kind of emergency ship but it feel kinda strange to have a Petard as a Scout essentially.

My idea for the main counter system:
Ballista Ship > Fire/Melee Ship > Mangonel Ship > Ballista Ship

Additional ships:

  • Arrow Ship (Trash version of Ballista Ship)
  • Demo Ship
  • Cannon Galleon
  • Trebuchet Ship (None Gunpowder version Cannon Galleon)
  • Dromon (Better version of Trebuchet Ship)

Feudal Age

  • Only Port is available
  • Only warship is the Scout Ship (Galley graphics)

The Scout Ship is weak and costs Food and Wood.
They have a long train time and are hard to mass. They can basically just be used for Scouting and harassing Fishing ships.

Castle Age

  • Shipyard becomes available
  • Ballista, Mangonel, Fire and Demo Ship become available

All Castle Age ships counter Arrow Ships.
This means even if you lost the control over water in Feudal Age you can easily regain it. Especially Ballista ships make quick work of Arrow ships.

Imperial Age

  • Gunpowder civilisations get access to the Cannon Galleon.
  • None gunpowder civilisations get access to the Trebuchet Ship.
  • Late Antiquity civilisations get access to the Dromon

Potential Trebuchet ship civs:
Aztecs, Bengalis, Chinese, Cumans, Incas, Magyars, Mayans, Mongols, Slavs, Vikings.The idea is that you have a decent all round ship that gives you a little micro potential by garrisoning land units. But that adds the risk of losing those units.
They can’t replace transports because they can’t even transport villagers.

Generic/Regional Ships

Anti Ship Bonus damage massively reduced. This is always hard to learn for new players because the game doesn’t show bonus damage and ship armour.
Ships should counter each other based on Melee and Pierce damage.

All ships can of course be upgraded in later Ages.
Mangonel Ships turn into Onager Ships and so on.

Arrow Ship Line

  • Starts with Galley
  • Weak pierce attack
  • Low armour
  • 0/5/10 Garrison slots in Feudal/Castle/Imperial Age
  • Can only Garrison Infantry and Archers (no Villagers and Cavalry)
  • Garrisoned Infantry increase speed
  • Garrisoned Archers increase attack
  • Cost Food and Wood
  • Affected by Archer upgrades

Ballista Ship Line

  • Medium Pierce and Melee armour
  • High Pierce damage (punches though medium Pierce Armour)
  • Use current War Galley and Galleon models
  • Cost Wood and Gold (more then the current Galley line)
  • Not affected by Archer upgrades
  • Affected by Siege Engineers

Fire Ship

  • Medium Pierce and high Melee armour
  • High Melee DPS
  • Potentially made into a regional ship like the Dromon
  • Not affected by Melee Blacksmith upgrades
  • Not affected by Siege Engineers

Melee/Ramming Ship

  • Potential alternative to the Fire Ship
  • Has a charged attack
  • Attacks much slower but with higher damage
  • Loses against a Fire Ship in direct combat
  • Affected by Melee Blacksmith upgrades

Mangonel Ship

  • High Pierce and low Melee armour
  • Same range as Ballista Ship
  • Do AoE damage (Wide enough to hit multiple Ballista Ships)
  • No bonus damage vs. Buildings
  • Slow movement speed
  • Affected by Siege Engineers

Demo Ship

  • Medium Pierce armour (Melee armour doesn’t really matter)
  • Basically the same as now
  • Affected by Siege Engineers

Trebuchet Ship

  • Very similar to a Cannon Galleon
  • No AoE damage at all
  • 14 range (1 more then Cannon Galleon, 1 less then Elite Cannon Galleon)
  • Same attack damage as Cannon Galleon
  • Affected by Siege Engineers

Cannon Galleon

  • Unchanged

Dromon

  • Unchanged

Unique Units

Longboat

  • Not much change
  • Inbettween an Arrow and a Ballista ship
  • Affected by Archer upgrades

Turtle Ship

  • Not much changed
  • High Melee armour
  • Weak to Mangonel Ships
  • Affected by Siege Engineers

Caravel

  • Not much changed
  • Basically a Ballista ship that can damage multiple ships in a line
  • Affected by Siege Engineers

Thirisadai

  • They are very similar to my proposed Ballista ship so they need a new role
  • Affected by Siege Engineers
  • Any ideas?

Siege units

Scorpion and Mangonel Line gain bonus damage vs. Ships.
Ships get negative damage vs. Siege units (like Cavalry does vs. Shotel Warriors).
This makes sure that it’s easier to fight back when the enemy gained naval superiority.
Especially Scorpions will shine at this task because they are affected by Ballistics now.

1 Like

Water play is fine as it is. In my opinion, the point of water in AoE2 is not to mimic land combat. Decision-making is not so much about which ships you make (this is fairly simple indeed), but rather how much investment you put into water vs land.

1 Like

Well, you might get me wrong. I don’t try to make the explosive ship a scout.

To be honest, I think the game does not need an exclusively scout ships in naval battles at all since water is not as complex as land. On water, there is no obstacle, the locations of resource are not as crucial as on land, and in the Dark age there is no danger but only fishing ships and Ports. You can just send a fishing ship to scout if you need. Although that ship cannot gather fish when it is scouting, but you don’t need to spend extra resources for a exclusive scout ship.

More importantly, I don’t really like a ship that can attack in the Dark age. I don’t appreciate such a design.

If really needed, I may make Transport ships have a broad light of sight to act like a scout. Or, I can accept that the Shipyards/Docks can be built in the Dark age, but only Scout ships can be trained then. The Scout ships here are the previous stage of Boarding warships or Arrow warships, cannot fire in the Dark Age, and will be automatically upgraded to Boarding warships or Arrow warships when hitting the Feudal age. (The Arrow warships could not and should not be trash units. If there must be a type of warship that is trash, I would decide Boarding warships because they have least control to coasts.)

Anyway, I still prefer the Boarding melee, Arrows, and Springald bolts to present the triangle of counters on water. The stone-launching ships should be to siege, and explosive ships could not have to be always necessary for naval battles.

2 Likes

I agree with that. Strange decision in Chronicles.

That’s actually a good idea.

This is actually a reasonable logic.
Also would make them more relevant in the late game since they don’t cost gold. Not on real water maps though because there you’ll often run out of Wood first.

I don’t really think there is much logic behind the Springald/Ballista/Scorpion ship being bad against Melee ships if the Arrow ship is not. They should have higher attack and therefor be more capable of punching though armour.

Why? Mangonels/Onager are already not siege units on land. They have very little bonus damage vs. buildings.
Having ranged AoE would help prevent massed Arrow/Springald ships from becoming OP.
It is also more natural for them to have no ballistics and therefor be bad against melee ships.

But in the end I think a rework that keeps all the currently existing ships has a way higher chance of success then one that removes some of the current ships.
The AoE2 community is extremely conservative and any change to water would also mean a change to a lot of existing content like most scenarios that involve water and a lot of fan made content too.

2 Likes

Most cringe among all the Ships is the one that moves without even opening it’s Sail.

I am amused no one is complaining how the ships are looking too similar in model to be confusing when played zoomed out.

1 Like

It’s literally the same thing, fire ship has 1 range while it has 0. Doesn’t make much of a difference if you ask me.

The use of springald means a lower firing frequency and a minimum range, and speed may also be bulky, which are obvious disadvantages against agile and fast-approaching boarding warships. On the other hand, when enemy soldiers have a chance to board my ship, the archers on my ship can still shoot them fast on the deck.

In terms of stats, for example, the pierce armor could be 5 for Boarding warships when the attack could be 8 for Springald warships. In this case, each Springald warship would deal only 3 damage per strike to Boarding warships, but might be caught up after one or two shots. On the other hand, Arrow warships could have 4 arrow each shot and the primary arrows could have 4 attack and +4 bonus vs Boarding warships, so each Arrow warship would cause at least 5 and up to 8 damage per strike to Boarding warships. Not to mention, Arrow warships would have a better chance of kiting Boarding warships.

For more, the pierce armor could be 4 for Arrow warships, and Springald warships could have 6 pierce armor and +4 bonus attack vs Arrow warships, so that Springald warships could deal 8 damage per strike to Arrow warships from a further range, and Arrow warships could deal 4 damage per strike to Springald warships.

Dromons are already firing stones, and currently they are more on siege than anti-ship.
I just want the thing simple. When people see the projectiles and the trajectory, they can directly tell what type of ship it is.
More importantly, I try to keep having 4 types of ship at most in a building, whether it’s Port or Shipyard.
If people really want ranged area damage on ships, maybe the stats of Bombard cannon warships and Dromons can have a simple adjustment.

However, the reworked triangle of countering with introducing Boarding/Arrow/Springald warships should theoretically be more effective at maintaining balance than the current one. Having Bombard cannon warships or Dromons could help in addition, but for the civs without them, one should still have a better chance of stopping opponents when they manage to amass a large number of ships of a single type.

1 Like

I’m pretty sure this water mechanism overhaul is a testing ground for the base game. My opinion is not to implement the whole thing.

My proposals are -

  • Divide the Dock into 2 buildings.
  • Add a scout ship from the new dock. I personally think this one should be a Feudal unit. Dark Age navy is too much for this game. No one will be able to use fish for economic advantage.
  • Divide war galley upgrades into 3.
  • Reduce Dromon range and attack bonus vs buildings. Make it available to most if not all civs. Can also be a Castle Age unit that can be upgraded in Imperial.
1 Like

Why not ask this AFTER people have played the DLC for dozens if not hundreds of hours? Anything other than rock papper scissors sounds better in theory, but the end result could be even more stale than old galley micro.

2 Likes

Wouldn’t it be relatively easy to just change the Dromons. Or make the new projectiles look more different. Like having them spread out in a larger area.
We already have Mangonels on land so it wouldn’t be a new thing for people to learn.

I get that but I kinda think there is 1 more needed.
The Archery Range also has 5 units if you are allied with the Berbers so the Siege ship could be in the 2nd row.

I guess you want the Springald ship be more of a Siege unit and less of a fast flexible Cavalry Archer like ship.

What do you think of the idea of giving it a Scorpion like attack that damages multiple units in a row like the Caravel currently does?
The Caravel would get a Organ Gun like attack in return, that would fit better into the Portuguese gunpowder theme.

To summarize:

Port:

  • Fishing Ship
  • Transport Ship
  • Trade Cog
  • Melee Ship

Shipyard:

  • Arrow Ship
  • Scorpion Ship
  • Demo Ship
  • Siege Ship
  • Unique Units

Dock

  • Scenario Editor exclusive building
  • Trains all ships
  • First page = Port
  • Second page = Shipyard
  • There to make all scenarios work

Additional Ideas

  • Melee ships can garrison Infantry for more attack and speed
  • Archer ships can garrison Archers for more attack
  • Archer ships can garrison in Shipyards to attack
  • Archers and Villagers can garrison in Shipyards to attack
  • Imperial Age tech that turn Arrow Ship into Hand Cannon Ship
  • Imperial Age tech that turns Scorpion Ship into Culverin Ship
  • Fire Ships replace Melee ships for some civilisations
  • Mangonel/Onager Ship replace Scorpion ships or Demo Ships for some civilisations
  • Trebuchet Ship replace Cannon Galleon for some civilisations (like American civs)
  • All ships get cooler names then the ones I used since I only used them to make clear what traits they have
1 Like