Where is the Jeanne D’arc rework?
That shit has to disappear from the game NOW
DELETE that OVERTUNED HORSE!!!
DELETE IT ALREADY
This is not league of legends.
1 Like
The civ is pretty lackluster - Jeanne doesnt do much till lvl 3 and before that she will die to like 4 spearman.
Pretty lackluster civ indeed.
56% winratio 1v1 in avg from bronze to conqueror.
Way above 50% winratio in ANY elo bracket from bronze to conqueror.
Needs absolutely zero skill.
Make knights, some archers, attackmove, press q e, win game.
Meanwhile the enemy has to kite the HELL out of your army, boom while trying to hold his base together and not EVER move out from his towncenter and wall himself in minute 2.
Amazing civ!
In Diamond this civ has one (!!!) matchup, where they got slightly below 50% winratio, which is ottomen.
47.9%.
Every other civ they DEMOLISH
In conqueror level they have 3 matchups with less than 50% winratio.
Allthough very small sample size.
So they might actually not be bad matchups.
This civ dominates hard in every elo range and completely destroys the strategic approach of the game.
You have to turtle and boom against this and avoid fighting at all cost until castle/imperial.
This is just super frustration.
Please delete that horse!!!
She is strong but it has nothing to do with her Cannon.
I do wish they made her have a cannon only if you picked the range jeanne though. Melee maybe a big mace would be more appropriate.
Conserning balance im sure it will be nerfed but it’s not her level 4 the issue. It’s that she reach level 3 too fast and not punished enough for dying.
The opponent is punished a lot for dying because of feeding her xp, if a player want to impose this type of win feedback loop on their opponent, they should have it themselves. This means JD should be more punished for dying. Like you need to revive her and it takes 20-30 seconds of your TC time + gold cost and she never revive for free.
They’ll not change how the civ plays out, at best you are looking at balance changes to make certain abilities more balanced but to change entirely how the civ plays and not around her anymore is not likely at all.
2 Likes
so they ruined the game. sometimes a REALLY BAD designed civ can ruin the game like china in aom ex
1 Like
They are not going to to that only because a small percentage of people dislike it
hahaha 
You are over reacting as always and besides there are ways to balance the civ out. Don’t like it, don’t play with that civ, easy solution.
1 Like
i taking my time with those. so dont hype up. actually you re the one over
People rushing to overreact to things they haven’t learned to deal with is an age-old thing in multiplayer video games. It’s not ruining anything. You dislike Jeanne, we got that one already. Well-known, at this point 
I agree completely with you.
There was absolutely no reason to make a civ like this, where 90% of the power is centered in one single unit.
This is not a moba and nooned asked for it.
The majority of the player-base that either like it or don’t mind it says otherwise. The fact of the matter is, that there is a minor but loud minority of same people that complain daily on these forums but in reality this expansion in general & this civ is being appreciated by most people.
Again it’s very simple you don’t have to like the civ, but to demand it being removed because for you it’s not a civ you want to play is simply ridiculous. Just don’t play as that civ and your problem goes away.
accepting it is like trying to chnage the fundament that made aoe great and 1 thign is the focus on unit and not heroes. They can be plaed as a secondary ones like aoe3 or aom on the result it does smth but it doesnt revolve the result of the battle on those