I think still winrates even with %52 still not giving enough evidence but I noticed play rate actually gives much more accurate in my opinion after all people tend to pick civs that they considered strong notably FatCuman,but even with them considering black forest casual player favorite it still doesnt represent after some part but its safe to say top 10 for both play rate and win rate has some mutual civs which are franks,mongols,slavs,huns,celts,aztecs and mayans so its definitly these not weak at all compared to other civs.But my argument is this these already strong giving them say for mongols giving final cavalry armor only going to effect their hussars in late game and thrash wars and that all, for that reason I do not believe its gonna make mongols autowin,civwin whatever its just very tiny buff which will effect meta very little almost unnoticable so thats why they should get it even just for rationalty sake despite them already being can be ignored and again same with steppe lancer almost no one uses them anymore.As for final archer armor tech I already made it clear that mangudai is a powerful unit it definitly needs to be taken into consideration unlike last cavalry armor tech.
For franks again my buff only gives them normal hussars(they do not have very good thrash either with elit skirms lacking bracer) and +5 HP for knights in castle age,6 hp for cavalier and 8 hp for paladins which in my opinion will not effect meta in a very noticable way again I believe it can be considered even if they do not need further buff just for rationalty sake and say its implemented to game its not like its gonna stay that way forever if its unbalanced anyway. I mean cumans were ridicolous did devs let them stay like that ? Or almost all african kingdoms civs when they first released.
Again byzantines bonus you are correct with your numbers but in feudal and dark age nobody attacks or aim to kill buldings anyway(expect palisade walls which cumans team doubles hp far more op). As for Castle age again there isnt much push happening towards bulding its more raid oriented rather siege and destruction.Only place where it effects game the most is imperial age in which they almost identical to some normal civs which lacking because again it supposed to be the time where they supposed make difference and impact more than just 2 treb shots or 5 ram shots(I mean in imperial age its very rare someone tries to take a bulding with single treb or ram or bc it very rarely occurs so bonus is good but overall lacking and I believe simply unlocking masonry or at least trying would be good to try after all as you can notice I m not saying give them both architecture and masonry just try out with masonry see feedback than if its way too strong simple just nerf it back if its good than keep it )
Ok so when I said “try to enjoy imp camels with no bloodline and only 1 armor upgrade” It’s because the Malay as a compensation of cheaper elephants get no Bloodlines, and only 1 armor upgrade. Even Vikings and Koreans get more! So basically if you give BE to Indians you have to take a lot of stuff away from them, wich would make their hussars and camels useless if they receive the Malay treatment
Unlike khmer and burmese their wouldnt get any special bonuses,also battle elephants can be countered by halbs with ease(very cheap trash unit) and I do believe majority of players will still choose to go imperial camels over battle elephants(even with indians eco I do not think on a 1 v 1 they can go for both at the same time). So overall I think it ll the way they play only by a little after all elephants are situational units.
But the Huns ARE a cav civ…
I was referring franks there…
Their hussar is worse against ranged units and better against melee. That’s not equal. The cav archers are worse in Imp but better in Castle. And who cares if they fall behind since they can be replaced with Mangudai?
For melee it makes no difference versus halbs or camel as they slaughtered very easily as they should be it only makes difference vs other hussars(which is rarely occurs) and for ranged units they are actually worse than generic full upgraded hussars. For cavalry archers CA you are right and I did mentioned that how much it ll make mangudai stonger needs to be considered.
Ok so if I play a late game civ like Goths or Portuguese against an early game civ and that I manage to survive I will have no advantadge if they get a buffed late game as well (and those civs already have a good enough lategame)
Thats why elo ranking exists in first place yeah you can take gamble like that but agasint more or less equally skilled person you gonna end up losing more than you gonna win.
Doing worse than a coin flip = OP??? How???
I was just commenting them based on winrate stuff there is nothing to comment about it