I dont know what is the purpouse of the addition of the card for Haude and Ethiopians.
Devs changed the aztec card to Calpulli in order to give it more flavour, then give the same card to Ethiopia with another unique name and Haudenosaunee a standard name.
This leads to 1) uneeded 3 names for same effect card (there is a thread about this kind of things) and 2) lost of uniqueness for aztec card.
A similar example are hunging bridges of inca and chinese, same effect but each one send the civ’s explorer unit. Lazy? Maybe, but still a difference.
How could these cards be changed to keep them unique??
5 Likes
If they stack then they are pretty powerful combo
Has anyone tested this?
I think this is not a problem. In a sense, it encourages various ethnic groups to combine and utilize their respective strengths to achieve a set of combos, even obtaining better units and more suitable advantages. This is a good tendency
The cards of Inca and Chinese people do not conflict. When they unite, they can receive a common acceleration, which allows them to have a common drummer when they combine
All that remains is to ally with Germany and send the 2 settler wagons.
I can’t think of anything that isn’t OP by teams. I think that’s fine.
Easy 13 vils card in age 2
The German would have to make a FF as quickly as possible and send that card so that it arrives as soon as possible. You could have a large number of villagers before minute 10.
More than that, I would like the icons of the new Cards implemented in the latest update to be updated.
Well, I think it’s only delayed because the small update was done in a hurry to get it done in time this year🎅