"Traditional" DLCs Question

[Quasibrodo]

@CitingOregano34

Experimental DLCs can be either as good as BoG or as terrible as V&V, there’s no inbetween

I don’t think using V&V as an example of an experimental DLC is warranted.

Is BFG DLC 5?

Actually this makes a lot of sense to me. Regardless of what the devs say, V&V doesn’t feel like an “experiment”. basically everything was recycled. Old filthy scenarios, intro and outro slides from previous scenarios, no new skins. Even the DLC icon was the old single player or multiplayer shield. One VA. Even the menu navigation, having it up in the corner with historical battles, seems like an afterthought. Seems baffling that you’d want to try a “single player only experiment” and then pu…

TLDR, I’m very certain now that V&V was a last minute panic project to fill a release slot, and was only retroactively marketing as “an experiment”.

So I don’t think it’s fair, using V&V and BFG as the evidence, to conclude experimental dlcs can only be good or terrible. Perhaps that is still true, but V&V i don’t believe to actually have been an experiment