What is WRONG between Microsoft and this game?!?

[Konahrik1140]

@LuminousBat543

As for the rest of your disgusting post not going dignify a further interaction with you. Now because I live in FL I’m not Colombian lmfao

I didn’t mean it with that intention, but if it bothers you I can remove that part from the comment.

---

@LuminousBat543

First of all, there are already 3 civs of Latin American based culture (Aztec, Inca and Mexican) not to mention Spain which is already the Colonizer is pretty much in the game. For a grand total of 4 ethnic/cultural Hispanic related background Civs. You want more? Are we going to release new Hispanic Civs every year? How about more Pacific Islander civs?

I stand by what I said, the Aztecs and the Incas of the game are the pre-Hispanic version, they do not seek to represent Latin America, they seek to represent the pre-Hispanic cultures.

Even if we use the word Latin Americans, this interpretation still seems incorrect to me.

---

@LuminousBat543

Spain conquered those areas covered by the Incas and Aztecs if history is any guidance. Which is why I add here ethnic/cultural Hispanic related background Civs. Incas and Aztecs are the ancestors of many Mestizos Latino/Hispanics such as myself that have Native American background and European mixes.

It seems too misleading to call the Aztecs and the Incas Latin Americans, Latin America was somewhat later than these empires, but I do agree that it influenced the population quite a bit at an ethnic and cultural level.

---

PS: Just in case I edited the previous comment, as I said before, I apologize if my previous comment offended you, I didn’t mean for the comment to sound like an attack.