- Aztecs/Mayans (Mixtecs, Tarascans, Zapotecs…)
- Bengalis (Sinhalese, ######### Assamese…)
- Berbers (Andalusians, Ifriqiyans, Tuaregs…)
- Bohemians/Poles (Kashubians, Moravians, Slovaks…)
- Britons (Saxons, Welsh…)
- Bulgarians (Chuvash/Volga-Bulgars…)
- Burgudians (Dutch, Flemish, Frisians…)
- Burmese (Arakanese/Rakhine, Manipuri, Mons, Shan…)
- Byzantines/Romans (Gallics, Latins, Romanians…)
- Celts (Gaels/Irish, Scots, Welsh…)
- Chinese/Koreans (Jurchens, Tibetans, Tanguts…)
- Cumans (Kazars, Kipchaks, Pechenegs…)
- Dravidians (Kannadas, Tamils, Telugus…)
- Ethiopians (Nubians, Somalis, Swahilis…)
- Franks (Bretons, Normans, Occitans…)
- Goths (Lombards, Saxons, Vandals…)
- Gurjaras (Gujarati, Rajastani, Sindhi…)
- Huns/Magyars (Avars, Hephtalites…)
- Hindustanis (Afghans/Khorasanians, Deccani, Punjabi…)
- Incas (Chankas, Chimu, Muisca…)
- Italians/Sicilians (Papals, Tuscanians, Venetians…)
- Japanese (Ainus, Emishis, Ryukuans…)
- Khmers/Vietnamese (Chams, Mons…)
- Lithuanians (Curonians/Latvians, Livonians, Prussians…)
- Malays (Chams, Javanese, Visayans…)
- Malians (Mossi, Ghanaians/Soninke, Songhais…)
- Mongols (Kalmyks/Oirats, Khitans…)
- Persians (Alans, Khwarazmians, Kurds…)
- Portuguese/Spanish (Aragonese/Catalans, Basque/Navarrese, Castilians…)
- Saracens (Bedouins, Levantines, Yemeni…)
- Slavs (Croatians, Rus’/Ruthenians, Serbians…)
- Tatars (Uighurs, Uzbeks…)
- Teutons (Alamanni/Swabians, Bavarians, Saxons…)
- Turks (Azeri, Gokhturks, Pechenegs…)
- Vikings (Danes, Norwegians, Swedes…)
- ALL OF THEM!
- None
- I don’t know
- I don’t care
0 voters
Since DE has come out, pretty much all dlc have been about splitting umbrella civs to an extent. So far, the Turks (Cumans, Tatars, Bulgarians), Slavs (Bohemians, Poles, Bulgarians again) and former Indians (Hindustanis, Bengalis, Dravidians, Gurjaras), and to a lesser extent Franks (Burgundians) and Italians (Sicilians), are the one who have been focused on the most, but there’s been a lot of talk about which other civs should receive a similar treatment. I’ve seen calls for certain umbrella splits since the African Kingdoms were announced, and I bet they were actually not the oldest ones, but I was curious to know what the community would request the most if asked directly.
The main difficulty was to answer the question “What is an umbrella civ?”, since it can group different civs based on cultural or geographical proximity, or for other reasons. Ultimately I settled on “could be covered by the same civ in a campaign”, though I sometimes cheated a bit: Hephtalites and Venetians sometimes appear in campaigns and are never features as Huns or Italians, for instance, I just thought it would make more sense to present them this way, and the Africans and American civs represent extremely large umbrellas because those areas are empty so this handful of civs are used as stand-ins for all their neighbours. Also, I grouped some civs together for the poll, usually because they are geographically and/or culturally close enough to be used by the same other civs, and also because I couldn’t find many ideas to split them separately. Arguably, some other pairing (or bigger groups) could have been done, but I think I found a good balance here.
Note that if there’s a civ you want in the game but you don’t perceive it as belonging to the umbrella I associated with, you shouldn’t necessarily vote for it. What I put between bracket are just exemples that don’t necessarily reflect any reality that you should abide to. Also, just because I used a possible civ as an exemple doesn’t necessarily mean I want to see it in the game in the future.