From your personal point of view (trying to argue), what would you change?
Civ X
- Unit X: Buff/Nerf/Rework because…
- Landmark X: …
Or
- General Unit X: …
You have all the freedom.
Units
General:
- Mangonel: It’s overnerfed.
HRE:
- Landsknecht: Needs a buff or rework its purpose, way too situational.
Chinese:
- Zhuge Nu: Needs a technology in Imperial age to keep it relevant, biggest weakness is its range.
- Fire Lancer: It’s mostly a cheese unit right now, should be more useful in combat.
- Palace Guard: Weirdly designed unit, 20% movement speed boost is hardly worth losing -1/-1 armor when being armored is the point of MAA. If it stays this way it should have a slightly cheaper food cost or give it better stats than MAA with a higher gold cost (most fitting option). Also, the +30 HP tech should go to Castle Age.
Delhi:
- Tower Elephant: It’s quite good in Castle Age but trails off too hard late game, especially because certain techs aren’t affecting it.
- War Elephant: Most of the time Tower Elephant is way better, any of these buffs would be good: increased armor, increased speed, another spearman on top, a camel-like debuff to surrounding enemies, or scary charge mechanic.
Rus:
- Warrior Monk: Increase the survivability as well as the blessing strength. I try to use this in my armies but it’s underwhelming even with the Abbey technologies, so not worth the trouble right now.
2 Likes
Well, that’s fine, but it would be nice to suggest what you think is the best way. Also write about landmarks and technologies if you feel like it.
English:
- Longbowman: needs to be weaker in Age 2 and stronger in Age 3. It’s just kind of a hunch but I personally think this is one of the main reasons why English have above 60% winrate in Age 2 and then immediately drop off in Age 3.
French:
- No clue, they have so many unique units… maybe they just have too many?