Why do I have the lowest score?

[SleightofEgo]

Can anyone tell me why I have such a low score?

Here, I have 183. The guy with the highest score has the same age2 time, slower age3, less %map, lower research count. What.

Git gud?

[ReachSouth]

I don’t know any official source, however there are some posts claiming that the score is based mostly on the amount of resources spent on tech. See for example:

The scoring and its insanity

I think score for tech at least is based on the amount of resources you spent on tech. As Delhi, this is always zero. I suspect society score is money spent on certain buildings: perhaps blacksmiths, universities and TCs? It’s very unclear to me though

[Pomknight]

I read on Reddit that Society score was based on resources spent on landmarks, with Abassid getting the lowest score and China getting the highest as a result.

I wouldn’t mind someone explaining the whole scoring system if someone has done testing to figure it out.

[SleightofEgo]

Yea this sounds about right to me too. I was indeed playing Dehli. I don’t think this makes sense though. You should still get points for upgrading the same as everyone else. Not because I want to have points because I clicked a button, but because if you are trying to figure out who is ahead at some moment in the game, you need to have the score reflect that, right? (for example, tournaments)

I guess for now you can just assume that the Dehli player should have an additional idk 1000 pts for every 20 minutes of game time that has passed.